Value of routine upper gastrointestinal swallow study after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

被引:10
|
作者
Chivot, Cyril [1 ]
Rebibo, Lionel [2 ]
Robert, Brice [1 ]
Dhahri, Abdennaceur [2 ]
Regimbeau, Jean-Marc [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yzet, Thierry [1 ]
机构
[1] Amiens Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Amiens, France
[2] Amiens Univ Hosp, Dept Digest Surg, Amiens, France
[3] Jules Verne Univ Picardie, Amiens, France
[4] Amiens Univ Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Amiens, France
关键词
Bariatric surgery; Sleeve gastrectomy; Upper gastrointestinal contrast studies; Complications; Gastric leak; UPPER GI SERIES; BARIATRIC SURGERY; GASTRIC BYPASS; LEAK; MANAGEMENT; RISK; EXPERIENCE; METAANALYSIS; STATEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2017.02.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gastric leak (GL) is one of the main early-onset postoperative complications of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Many institutions perform routine upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast studies within 24 hours of surgery, looking for GL or gastric stenosis and to determine the need for urgent re-exploration, but this examination delays oral feeding, can cause side effects and is responsible for systematic and probably unnecessary irradiation of the patient. Objective: Determine the efficacy of routine UGI contrast studies to predict postoperative complications after SG in a large population. Setting: University hospital, France, public practice. Material and methods: This study consisted of retrospective review of a prospective database of a cohort of patients who underwent primary SG between January 2007 and August 2013 (n = 1137). Routine UGI contrast studies, performed on postoperative day 1, were independently reviewed by 2 radiologists. The primary endpoint of the study was the effect of routine UGI contrast study on detecting postoperative complications. The secondary endpoints were comparison of the findings of routine UGI contrast study and abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan, sensitivity, and specificity of different imaging signs on abdominal CT scan in the presence of GL, evaluation of the SG learning curve based on the findings of routine UGI contrast studies. Results: A total of 1137 patients underwent primary SG and 30 GL (2.6%) with a mean time to diagnosis of 23.4 days (1-245) and 15 cases of gastric stenosis (1.3%) were observed during the study period. Routine UGI study was performed in 1108 patients, whereas 29 patients were assessed by first-line CT scan. None of the 1108 UGI studies found a GL or gastric stenosis. In the 30 cases of GL, the most sensitive and specific sign was the presence of perigastric abscess without contrast material leak (sensitivity: 56.6%; specificity: 95%). The mean time interval between routine postoperative UGI contrast study and abdominal CT scan was 12.9 days (0-86). Uniform gastric shape was acquired after 30-32 SG procedures. Conclusion: Routine postoperative UGI on postoperative day 1 is of limited value after SG. Abdominal CT scan should be preferred in the presence of clinical suspicion of postoperative complications. Selective UGI contrast study remains indicated when gastric stenosis is suspected and at the beginning of the SG learning curve. (C) 2017 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 765
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Single-port laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a routine procedure in 1000 patients
    Gaillard, Martin
    Tranchart, Hadrien
    Lainas, Panagiotis
    Ferretti, Stefano
    Perlemuter, Gabriel
    Dagher, Ibrahim
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2016, 12 (07) : 1270 - 1277
  • [22] Intraoperative leak testing has no correlation with leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
    Sethi, Monica
    Zagzag, Jonathan
    Patel, Karan
    Magrath, Melissa
    Somoza, Eduardo
    Parikh, Manish S.
    Saunders, John K.
    Ude-Welcome, Aku
    Schwack, Bradley F.
    Kurian, Marina S.
    Fielding, George A.
    Ren-Fielding, Christine J.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (03): : 883 - 891
  • [23] Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms
    Carabotti, Marilia
    Silecchia, Gianfranco
    Greco, Francesco
    Leonetti, Frida
    Piretta, Luca
    Rengo, Marco
    Rizzello, Mario
    Osborn, John
    Corazziari, Enrico
    Severi, Carola
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2013, 23 (10) : 1551 - 1557
  • [24] Changes of the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy findings in patients with severe obesity after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a short-term study
    Mohamed, Ahmed A.
    Eisha, Hesham A. A.
    Elshawy, Ahmed M.
    Abdelsalam, Ahmed M.
    Saqr, Ahmed S.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 41 (04) : 1557 - 1562
  • [25] Is Routine Postoperative Gastrografin Study Needed After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy? Experience of 712 Cases
    Wahby, M.
    Salama, A. F.
    Elezaby, A. F.
    Belgrami, F.
    Abd Ellatif, M. E.
    El-Kaffas, H. F.
    Al-Katary, M.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2013, 23 (11) : 1711 - 1717
  • [26] Results and complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
    Reinhard Mittermair
    Robert Sucher
    Alexander Perathoner
    Surgery Today, 2014, 44 : 1307 - 1312
  • [27] Does routine upper gastrointestinal swallow study after metabolic and bariatric surgery lead to earlier diagnosis of leak?
    Trac, Jessica
    Balas, Michael
    Gee, Denise
    Hutter, Matthew M.
    Jung, James J.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2024, 20 (08) : 767 - 773
  • [28] Value of Routine Postoperative Gastrographin Contrast Swallow Studies After Laparoscopic Gastric Banding
    Frezza, Eldo E.
    Mammarappallil, Joseph G.
    Witt, Chance
    Wei, Cai
    Wachtel, Mitchell S.
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2009, 144 (08) : 766 - 769
  • [29] Impact on Dyslipidemia After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
    Vigilante, Agustina
    Signorini, Franco
    Marani, Marcos
    Paganini, Virginia
    Viscido, German
    Navarro, Luciano
    Obeide, Lucio
    Moser, Federico
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2018, 28 (10) : 3111 - 3115
  • [30] Volumetric pouch study after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy
    Sabry, Ahmed A.
    Emara, Doaa
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 37 (02) : 265 - 269