How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?

被引:46
作者
Sonoda, Yuta [1 ]
Oishi, Kazato [1 ]
Chomei, Yosuke [2 ]
Hirooka, Hiroyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Agr, Sakyo Ku, Kitashirakawa Oiwake Cho, Kyoto, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Fac Agr, Higashi Ku, Hakozaki 6-10-1, Fukuoka, Fukuoka 8128581, Japan
关键词
Animal welfare; Consumer preferences; Environmental impacts; Labeling; Latent class model; Schwartz human values; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SUSTAINABLE FOOD-CONSUMPTION; BASIC HUMAN-VALUES; PERSONAL VALUES; CHOICE EXPERIMENT; QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; ATTITUDES; HEALTH; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.07.030
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Animal welfare and environmental impacts have been emphasized in the sustainable production of livestock. Labels are useful tools for clearly providing such attribute information to consumers. The aim of this study was to evaluate how human values influence consumer segments for beef with information on animal welfare and environmentally friendly production. Using a choice experiment, we examined whether animal welfare and environmentally friendly labels, country of origin and price impact consumer choice. As results, five heterogeneous consumer classes were identified using a latent class model: label conscious, domestic beef preferring, price conscious, animal welfare preferring and not interested in production method. Almost 90% of consumers were interested in and willing to pay for beef with animal welfare or environmentally friendly label. The classes with significant preferences for such labeled beef were affected by "openness to change", "self-enhancement" and "security". Improving consumer attitudes and strengthening consumer perception towards labeled beef by marketers and policy makers will be required.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 86
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
  • [41] Hensher DA, 2015, APPLIED CHOICE ANALYSIS, 2ND EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9781316136232
  • [42] Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research - Common errors and some comment on improved practice
    Henson, Robin K.
    Roberts, J. Kyle
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 66 (03) : 393 - 416
  • [43] Trading off health, environmental and genetic modification attributes in food
    Hu, WY
    Hünnemeyer, A
    Veeman, M
    Adamowicz, W
    Srivastava, L
    [J]. EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 31 (03) : 389 - 408
  • [44] Measuring the consumer benefits of improving farm animal welfare to inform welfare labelling
    Kehlbacher, A.
    Bennett, R.
    Balcombe, K.
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2012, 37 (06) : 627 - 633
  • [46] Kjaernes U, 2007, TRUST IN FOOD: A COMPARATIVE AND INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230627611
  • [47] The impact of fat content, production methods and carbon footprint information on consumer preferences for minced meat
    Koistinen, L.
    Pouta, E.
    Heikkila, J.
    Forsman-Hugg, S.
    Kotro, J.
    Makela, J.
    Niva, M.
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2013, 29 (02) : 126 - 136
  • [48] Using non-food information to identify food-choice segment membership
    Kornelis, Marcel
    van Herpen, Erica
    van der Lans, Ivo
    Aramyan, Lusine
    [J]. FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2010, 21 (05) : 512 - 520
  • [49] ON APPROXIMATING THE STATISTICAL PROPERTIES OF ELASTICITIES
    KRINSKY, I
    ROBB, AL
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1986, 68 (04) : 715 - 719
  • [50] Krystallis A., 2008, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, V7, P164, DOI 10.1002/cb.244