Cancer patients' preferences for communicating clinical trial quality of life information: A qualitative study

被引:40
作者
Brundage, M
Leis, A
Bezjak, A
Feldman-Stewart, D
Degner, L
Velji, K
Zetes-Zanatta, L
Tu, D
Ritvo, P
Pater, J
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M4X 1K9, Canada
[5] Univ Manitoba, Fac Nursing, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada
[6] NCIC Clin Trials Grp, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
cancer; controlled clinical trials; patient education; quality of life;
D O I
10.1023/A:1023404731041
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a prevalent outcome measure in clinical trials, but it is not known how best to communicate HRQL results to new patients with cancer. The purpose was to explore cancer patients' attitudes toward, and preferences for, 10 visual and written formats for communicating HRQL information. Using standardized qualitative methods, six focus groups were held ( two groups in each of three cancer centres) with patients who had completed treatment for cancer at least 6 months earlier. Groups were stratified according to patients' education. To ensure consistency across centres, group moderators used the same detailed guide, training video, and props. Three investigators independently coded the resulting transcripts. Participants also rated each of the 10 presentation formats as to their perceived usefulness. Fourteen men and 19 women with a variety of cancer diagnoses participated; 13 (39%) participated in the three lower-education groups and 20 (61%) in the three higher-education groups. We found that simple formats (simple graphs or written text) were generally preferred to more complex graphical information, regardless of educational level. The same format was rated favourably by the highest proportion of participants in both the high (85%) and low (85%) education level groups. Individual patients, however, varied as to which visual format they most preferred. Patients did not wish to receive HRQL information out of context or without explanation. We conclude that cancer patients desire HRQL information, but vary in their preferences for its communication. Simple formats are generally preferred.
引用
收藏
页码:395 / 404
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    AARONSON, NK
    AHMEDZAI, S
    BERGMAN, B
    BULLINGER, M
    CULL, A
    DUEZ, NJ
    FILIBERTI, A
    FLECHTNER, H
    FLEISHMAN, SB
    DEHAES, JCJM
    KAASA, S
    KLEE, M
    OSOBA, D
    RAZAVI, D
    ROFE, PB
    SCHRAUB, S
    SNEEUW, K
    SULLIVAN, M
    TAKEDA, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [2] CRITICAL-REVIEW OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSESSMENTS OF HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE
    ANDERSON, RT
    AARONSON, NK
    WILKIN, D
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1993, 2 (06) : 369 - 395
  • [3] OVERVIEW OF FOCUS GROUP RESEARCH
    ASBURY, JE
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 1995, 5 (04) : 414 - 420
  • [4] Ashbury F D, 1997, Cancer Prev Control, V1, P222
  • [5] Bezjak A, 1998, Cancer Prev Control, V2, P230
  • [6] Science, language, intuition, and the many meanings of quality of life
    Browman, GP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (06) : 1651 - 1653
  • [7] Carey M.A., 1994, QUAL HEALTH RES, V4, P123, DOI DOI 10.1177/104973239400400108
  • [8] CONCERNS IN THE ANALYSIS OF FOCUS GROUP DATA - COMMENT
    CAREY, MA
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 1995, 5 (04) : 487 - 495
  • [9] CARSWELL CM, 1995, PSYCHOL SCI AGENDA, P8
  • [10] INFORMATION AND PARTICIPATION PREFERENCES AMONG CANCER-PATIENTS
    CASSILETH, BR
    ZUPKIS, RV
    SUTTONSMITH, K
    MARCH, V
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1980, 92 (06) : 832 - 836