Rationalization in Korea container terminal using DEA cross-efficiency and cluster analysis

被引:7
作者
Kim, Sungki [1 ]
Kim, Chanho [1 ]
Kim, Sangyoul [2 ]
Choi, Sanggyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Maritime Inst, Port Operat Dept, Pusan 49111, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ, Grad Sch Int Studies, Busan 46241, South Korea
关键词
Rationalization; Terminal efficiency; Data envelopment analysis; Cluster analysis; SELECTION; PORTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajsl.2021.12.002
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Ports and container terminals today are interchanges for maritime and land transport as well as important facilities that serve as communication channels for nations, regional economies, and forelands. They also act as suppliers providing cargo handling and international logistics services at the national level. Traditionally, the port industry was less competitive than other industries. However, competition among terminals is intensifying due to recent environmental changes, and the excessive competition between Korean container terminals has produced negative effects. Therefore, it is necessary to establish terminal rationalization plans to resolve excessive competition among container terminals at the national level. This study examined the direction for terminal rationalization at the national level to alleviate excessive competition among container terminals based on the theory of supply base rationalization. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) cross-efficiency and cluster analysis were combined to provide rationalization plans based on efficiency measurement. This study is significant as it presents a strategic analytical tool to establish terminal rationalization plans at the national level and also proves its applicability. (c) 2022 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Korean Association of Shipping and Logistics, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). CC_BY_NC_ND_4.0
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 70
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context [J].
Adler, N ;
Friedman, L ;
Sinuany-Stern, Z .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 140 (02) :249-265
[2]  
Agrawal N., 1997, Production and Operations Management, V6, P291, DOI 10.1111/j.1937-5956.1997.tb00432.x
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, BERTH PROD TRENDS OU
[4]  
Azadi Majid, 2012, International Journal of Operational Research, V13, P44
[5]   A supervised machine learning approach to data-driven simulation of resilient supplier selection in digital manufacturing [J].
Cavalcante, Ian M. ;
Frazzon, Enzo M. ;
Forcellini, Fernando A. ;
Ivanov, Dmitry .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 :86-97
[6]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[7]  
Cousins P.D., 1999, EUROPEAN J PURCHASIN, V5, P143, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0969-7012(99)00019-2
[8]  
Cullinane K., 2004, REV NETW ECON, V3, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2202/1446-9022.1050, DOI 10.2202/1446-9022.1050]
[9]  
Cullinane K., 2006, INT J LOGIST-RES APP, V9, P19, DOI [10.1080/13675560500322417, DOI 10.1080/13675560500322417]
[10]  
De Langen PW, 2006, INT J TRANSP ECON, V33, P69