Assessment of gingival biotype and facial hard/soft tissue dimensions in the maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography

被引:42
作者
Amid, Reza [1 ]
Mirakhori, Mandieh [2 ,5 ]
Safi, Yaser [3 ]
Kadkhodazadeh, Mandi [1 ]
Namdari, Mahshid [4 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Res Inst Dent Sci, Sch Dent, DDS,Dent Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Tehran, Iran
[4] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Dent, Dept Community Oral Hlth, Tehran, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Dentogingival complex; Gingival thickness; Bone thickness; Gingival biotype; Cone beam computed tomography; Periodontal biotype; IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT; LABIAL BONE; PERIODONTAL BIOTYPE; THICKNESS; SOFT; GRAFT; PROBE;
D O I
10.1016/j.archoralbio.2017.02.021
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: This study sought to assess the relationship between facial gingival and bone dimensions in maxillary anterior teeth region using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Design: This study assessed 621 maxillary anterior teeth in 144 patients. In the sagittal plane, facial bone thickness (BT) and gingival thickness (GT) were measured at the crestal level and at 2, 4 and 6 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The dentogingival complex (DGC) dimensions and the distance from the CEJ to bone crest were also measured on CBCT scans. To determine the gingival biotype, GT at 2 mm apical to the gingival margin was measured and GT < 1.5 mm was categorized as thin while GT > 1.5 mm was categorized as thick. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 21 via repeated measures ANOVA and the Cochrane's Q chi-square and independent samples t-tests. Results: The BT around the maxillary central and lateral incisors and canine teeth at 4 and 6 mm apical to the CEJ was significantly different in thick and thin gingival biotypes (P < 0.05). The mean GT at 2 and 4 mm apical to the CEJ was significantly different around central and lateral incisors (P < 0.05). Thickness of crestal bone was significantly different between the two gingival biotypes around central and lateral incisors (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The two gingival biotypes had significantly different mean BT; different biotypes and their relationship to BT varied around anterior maxillary teeth. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Arora R, 2013, INT J PERIODONT REST, V33, P763, DOI 10.11607/prd.1501
[2]  
Borges G. J., 2015, SCI WORLD J
[3]  
BUSER D, 2003, THE INTERNATIONAL JO, V19, P43
[4]   RELATIONSHIP OF GINGIVAL THICKNESS AND BLEEDING TO LOSS OF PROBING ATTACHMENT IN SHALLOW SITES FOLLOWING NONSURGICAL PERIODONTAL THERAPY [J].
CLAFFEY, N ;
SHANLEY, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1986, 13 (07) :654-657
[5]  
Cook DR, 2011, INT J PERIODONT REST, V31, P345
[6]   The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva [J].
De Rouck, Tim ;
Eghbali, Rouhollah ;
Collys, Kristiaan ;
De Bruyn, Hugo ;
Cosyn, Jan .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 36 (05) :428-433
[7]   The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians [J].
Eghbali, Aryan ;
De Rouck, Tim ;
De Bruyn, Hugo ;
Cosyn, Jan .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 36 (11) :958-963
[8]   Analysis of the dimensions of the labial bone wall in the anterior maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study [J].
El Nahass, Hani ;
Naiem, Suzy N. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (04) :e57-e61
[9]   Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets [J].
Ferrus, Jorge ;
Cecchinato, Denis ;
Pjetursson, E. Bjarni ;
Lang, Niklaus P. ;
Sanz, Mariano ;
Lindhe, Jan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (01) :22-29
[10]   On the relationship between gingival biotypes and gingival thickness in young Caucasians [J].
Fischer, Kai R. ;
Richter, Timo ;
Kebschull, Moritz ;
Petersen, Nicole ;
Fickl, Stefan .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 (08) :865-869