Consumers' and Farmers' Perceptions in Europe Regarding the Use of Composted Bedding Material from Cattle

被引:7
作者
Klopcic, Marija [1 ]
Erjavec, Karmen [2 ]
Waldrop, Megan [3 ]
Roosen, Jutta [3 ]
Engel, Petra [4 ]
Galama, Paul [5 ]
Kuipers, Abele [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Biotech Fac, Dept Anim Sci, SI-1230 Domzale, Slovenia
[2] Univ Novo Mesto, Fac Econ & Informat, SI-8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia
[3] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Sch Management, DE-85354 Freising Weihenstephan, Germany
[4] Justus Liebig Univ Giessen, Inst Tierzuchtung, DE-35390 Giessen, Germany
[5] Wageningen Univ & Res, Livestock Res, NL-6708 WD Wageningen, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
composting material; cattle housing; alternative use; produce; circular economy; marketing; farmer and consumer; perceptions; ESCHERICHIA-COLI O157-H7; ALTERNATIVE HOUSING SYSTEM; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; BOVINE MANURE; FATE; SOIL; WELFARE; FERTILIZER; SURVIVAL; CARROTS;
D O I
10.3390/su13095128
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
By-products like sawdust and straw are applied in compost bedded-pack barns (CBP) for cattle. These materials, which are gradually mixed with excreta and undergo a composting process, serve as a lying bed for the cattle. This study aims to assess the perception of consumers and farmers regarding the use of CBP during the grazing season of cattle for raising other animals or for growing food crops. This was examined by combining surveys with consumers from eight European countries and cattle farmers, focus groups with consumers, and in-depth interviews with individual farmers who implemented alternative uses of compost. The results showed that farmers preferred the compost bedded-pack system to the cubicle system in terms of sustainability and market aspects, although the cost of the bedding material required for CBP was seen as a significant negative aspect. Around half of all consumers indicated that the compost can be used for non-edible products and 26% indicated the compost can be used for raising other animals. Furthermore, 5% of consumers felt that compost should not be used for any other purpose. There were statistically significant differences between countries; therefore, regional specificities should be taken into account when marketing products from compost in CBP barns.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Alemi H., 2010, Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, V9, P74
  • [2] Consumers' Concerns and Perceptions of Farm Animal Welfare
    Alonso, Marta E.
    Gonzalez-Montana, Jose R.
    Lomillos, Juan M.
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2020, 10 (03):
  • [3] [Anonymous], SPECIAL EUROBAROMETE
  • [4] Performance and welfare of dairy cows in an alternative housing system in Minnesota
    Barberg, A. E.
    Endres, M. I.
    Salfer, J. A.
    Reneau, J. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 (03) : 1575 - 1583
  • [5] Beardsworth A., 2002, British Food Journal, V104, P470, DOI 10.1108/00070700210418767
  • [6] Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review
    Bernal, M. P.
    Alburquerque, J. A.
    Moral, R.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (22) : 5444 - 5453
  • [7] Compost bedded-pack barn as an alternative housing system for dairy cattle in Italy: effects on animal health and welfare and milk and milk product quality
    Biasato, Ilaria
    D'Angelo, Antonio
    Bertone, Ride
    Odore, Rosangela
    Bellino, Claudio
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 18 (01) : 1142 - 1153
  • [8] Cummins A., 2015, PERCEPTIONS ANIMAL A, P26
  • [9] EEA, 2016, European Union Emission Inventory Report 1990-2014 under the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP) (No. 16/2016)
  • [10] Eggerth LL, 2007, WASTE MANAG SER, V8, P325