Safety and efficacy of neublastin in painful lumbosacral radiculopathy: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial using Bayesian adaptive design (the SPRINT trial)

被引:24
作者
Backonja, Miroslav [1 ,2 ]
Williams, Leslie [3 ]
Miao, Xiaopeng [3 ]
Katz, Nathaniel [4 ,5 ]
Chen, Crystal [3 ]
机构
[1] PRA Hlth Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Dept Neurol, Madison, WI USA
[3] Biogen, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Analges Solut, Natick, MA USA
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
关键词
SPRINT; Neublastin; Bayesian adaptive; Painful lumbosacral radiculopathy; Sciatica; HERNIATION-INDUCED SCIATICA; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; DISC HERNIATION; IMMPACT RECOMMENDATIONS; SYSTEMIC ARTEMIN; CLINICAL-TRIALS; RADICULAR PAIN; BACK-PAIN; INFLIXIMAB;
D O I
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000983
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Neublastin (BG00010) is a first-in-class, glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor shown in preclinical studies and an early clinical trial to have potential for the treatment of neuropathic pain. SPRINT was a phase 2, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to evaluate efficacy/safety of 5 neublastin doses (50, 150, 400, 800, and 1200 mu g/kg) administered as an intravenous injection 3 times/week for 1 week in patients with chronic painful lumbosacral radiculopathy, utilizing Bayesian response-adaptive study design. Primary endpoint was change frombaseline inmean 24-hour average general pain intensity over a 5-day period (week 1) after the last dose, analyzed using a Bayesian normal dynamic linear model. One hundred seventy-six patients were randomized and received treatment (placebo n = 48, 50 mu g/kg n = 38, 150 mu g/kg n = 13, 400 mu g/kg n = 16, 800 mu g/kg n = 20, 1200 mu g/kg n = 41). Among the tested neublastin doses, the lowest dose (50 mu g/kg) showed the greatest difference from placebo for change from baseline inmean average general pain intensity at week 1 after last dose, followed by the highest dose (1200 mu g/kg) (posterior mean difference -1.36 [95% credible interval -2.22 to -0.52] and -0.75 [-1.59 to 0.08], respectively). Similar trends were observed in secondary efficacy endpoints. The most common adverse event in all neublastin dose groups was pruritus (79% vs 10% with placebo). There was no dose-response relationship with respect to primary/secondary efficacy outcomes or incidence of pruritus, despite dose-proportional increases in serum neublastin concentrations. In conclusion, while this study showed some evidence of pain relief with neublastin, particularly at the lowest dose, there was no clear dose-response relationship for pain reduction or the most common adverse event of pruritus.
引用
收藏
页码:1802 / 1812
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   The GDNF family: Signalling, biological functions and therapeutic value [J].
Airaksinen, MS ;
Saarma, M .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (05) :383-394
[2]   EFNS guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain: 2010 revision [J].
Attal, N. ;
Cruccu, G. ;
Baron, R. ;
Haanpaa, M. ;
Hansson, P. ;
Jensen, T. S. ;
Nurmikko, T. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2010, 17 (09) :1113-E88
[3]   Artemin, a novel member of the GDNF ligand family, supports peripheral and central neurons and signals through the GFRα3-RET receptor complex [J].
Baloh, RH ;
Tansey, MG ;
Lampe, PA ;
Fahrner, TJ ;
Enomoto, H ;
Simburger, KS ;
Leitner, ML ;
Araki, T ;
Johnson, EM ;
Milbrandt, J .
NEURON, 1998, 21 (06) :1291-1302
[4]   The efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy [J].
Baron, Ralf ;
Freynhagen, Rainer ;
Toelle, Thomas R. ;
Cloutier, Christian ;
Leon, Teresa ;
Murphy, T. Kevin ;
Phillips, Kern .
PAIN, 2010, 150 (03) :420-427
[5]   Artemin has potent neurotrophic actions on injured C-fibres [J].
Bennett, David L. H. ;
Boucher, Timothy J. ;
Michael, Gregory J. ;
Popat, Reena J. ;
Malcangio, Marzia ;
Averill, Sharon A. ;
Poulsen, Kris T. ;
Priestley, John V. ;
Shelton, David L. ;
McMahon, Stephen B. .
JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2006, 11 (04) :330-345
[6]  
Berry D.A., 2001, Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics V, P99
[7]   Development and validation of the neuropathic pain symptom inventory [J].
Bouhassira, D ;
Attal, N ;
Fermanian, J ;
Alchaar, H ;
Gautron, M ;
Masquelier, E ;
Rostaing, S ;
Lanteri-Minet, M ;
Collin, E ;
Grisart, J ;
Boureau, F .
PAIN, 2004, 108 (03) :248-257
[8]  
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, STAT REV EV CROF TAB
[9]  
Cleeland C S., BRIEF PAIN INVENTORY
[10]   Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations [J].
Dworkin, RH ;
Turk, DC ;
Farrar, JT ;
Haythornthwaite, JA ;
Jensen, MP ;
Katz, NP ;
Kerns, RD ;
Stucki, G ;
Allen, RR ;
Bellamy, N ;
Carr, DB ;
Chandler, J ;
Cowan, P ;
Dionne, R ;
Galer, BS ;
Hertz, S ;
Jadad, AR ;
Kramer, LD ;
Manning, DC ;
Martin, S ;
McCormick, CG ;
McDermott, MP ;
McGrath, P ;
Quessy, S ;
Rappaport, BA ;
Robbins, W ;
Robinson, JP ;
Rothman, M ;
Royal, MA ;
Simon, L ;
Stauffer, JW ;
Stein, W ;
Tollett, J ;
Wernicke, J ;
Witter, J .
PAIN, 2005, 113 (1-2) :9-19