AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS PROMOTING BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY

被引:3
|
作者
Kervroedan, Lea [1 ]
Houben, David [1 ]
Guidet, Julien [1 ]
Denier, Julia [1 ]
Dulaurent, Anne-Maimiti [1 ]
Marraccini, Elisa [2 ,3 ]
Deligey, Amandine [2 ,4 ]
Journel, Charlotte [4 ]
Lamerre, Justine [4 ]
Faucon, Michel-Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, AGHYLE SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[2] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, InTerACT 2018 C102, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Agrotransfert Ressources & Terr, 2 Chaussee Brunehaut, F-80200 Estrees Mons, France
关键词
alternative cropping systems; bioeconomy; biogas; biomass production; fertilization autonomy; greenhouse gas assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; SORGHUM BIOMASS; EMISSIONS; QUALITY; BALANCE; YIELD;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2021435
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Bioenergy, currently the largest renewable energy source in the EU (64% of the total renewable energy consumption), has sparked great interest to meet the 32% renewable resources for the 2030 bioeconomy goal. The design of innovative cropping systems informed by bioeconomy imperatives requires the evaluate of the effects of introducing crops for bioenergy into conventional crop rotations. This study aimed to assess the impacts of changes in conventional cropping systems in mixed dairy cattle farms redesigned to introduce bioenergy crops either by increasing the biomass production through an increase of cover crops, while keeping main feed/food crops, or by substituting food crops with an increase of the crop rotation length. The assessment is based on the comparison between conventional and innovative systems oriented to feed and biogas production, with and without tillage, to evaluate their agri-environmental performances (biomass production, nitrogen fertilization autonomy, greenhouse gas emissions and biogas production). The result showed higher values in the biogas cropping system than in the conventional and feed ones for all indicators, biomass productivity (27% and 20% higher, respectively), nitrogen fertilization autonomy (26% and 73% higher, respectively), methanogenic potential (77% and 41% higher, respectively) and greenhouse gas emissions (15% and 3% higher, respectively). There were no negative impacts of no-till compared to the tillage practice, for all tested variables. The biogas cropping system showed a better potential in terms of agri-environmental performance, although its greenhouse gas emissions were higher. Consequently, it would be appropriate to undertake a multicriteria assessment integrating agri-environmental, economic and social performances. (C) The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 294
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Environmental and economic performance assessment of integrated conventional solar photovoltaic and agrophotovoltaic systems
    Junedi, M. M.
    Ludin, N. A.
    Kathleen, P. R.
    Hamid, N. H.
    Hasila, J.
    Affandi, N. A. Ahmad
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 168
  • [42] Comparison of crop productivity, economic benefit and environmental footprints among diversified multi-cropping systems in South China
    Xian, Yuanran
    Cai, Guangyuan
    Lin, Jiajun
    Chen, Yong
    Wang, Xiaolong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 874
  • [43] Economic assessment of conventional and conservation tillage practices in different wheat-based cropping systems of Punjab, Pakistan
    Shahzad, Muhammad
    Hussain, Mubshar
    Farooq, Muhammad
    Farooq, Shahid
    Jabran, Khawar
    Nawaz, Ahmad
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (31) : 24634 - 24643
  • [44] Low-Input Maize-Based Cropping Systems Implementing IWM Match Conventional Maize Monoculture Productivity and Weed Control
    Adeux, Guillaume
    Giuliano, Simon
    Cordeau, Stephane
    Savoie, Jean-Marie
    Alletto, Lionel
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2017, 7 (09):
  • [45] Biomass production, carbon sequestration potential and productivity of different peanut (Arachis hypogaea)-based cropping systems and their effect on soil carbon dynamics
    Jain, N. K.
    Meena, H. N.
    Yadav, R. S.
    Jat, R. S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2018, 88 (07): : 1044 - 1053
  • [46] Environmental Impact Evaluation of Cropping Systems Using Life Cycle Assessment: Case Study of Central Tunisia
    Jouini, Meriem
    Biard, Yannick
    Benaissa, Nadhira
    Burte, Julien
    Amara, Hajer
    Sinfort, Carole
    RECENT ADVANCES IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE FROM THE EURO-MEDITERRANEAN AND SURROUNDING REGIONS, VOLS I AND II, 2018, : 287 - 289
  • [47] The Dependence of Cocksfoot Productivity of Liming and Nitrogen Application and the Assessment of Qualitative Parameters and Environmental Impact Using Biomass for Biofuels
    Siaudinis, Gintaras
    Jasinskas, Algirdas
    Karcauskiene, Danute
    Sarauskis, Egidijus
    Lekaviciene, Kristina
    Repsiene, Regina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (19)
  • [48] Performance and Sustainability of Organic and Conventional Cotton Farming Systems in Egypt: An Environmental and Energy Assessment
    Mehmeti, Andi
    Abdelhafez, Ahmed Abdelwahab M.
    Ellssel, Pierre
    Todorovic, Mladen
    Calabrese, Generosa
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (15)
  • [49] Environmental performance of social housing in emerging economies: life cycle assessment of conventional and alternative construction methods in the Philippines
    Salzer, Corinna
    Wallbaum, Holger
    Ostermeyer, York
    Kono, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (11): : 1785 - 1801
  • [50] Environmental performance of social housing in emerging economies: life cycle assessment of conventional and alternative construction methods in the Philippines
    Corinna Salzer
    Holger Wallbaum
    York Ostermeyer
    Jun Kono
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1785 - 1801