AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS PROMOTING BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY

被引:3
|
作者
Kervroedan, Lea [1 ]
Houben, David [1 ]
Guidet, Julien [1 ]
Denier, Julia [1 ]
Dulaurent, Anne-Maimiti [1 ]
Marraccini, Elisa [2 ,3 ]
Deligey, Amandine [2 ,4 ]
Journel, Charlotte [4 ]
Lamerre, Justine [4 ]
Faucon, Michel-Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, AGHYLE SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[2] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, InTerACT 2018 C102, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Agrotransfert Ressources & Terr, 2 Chaussee Brunehaut, F-80200 Estrees Mons, France
关键词
alternative cropping systems; bioeconomy; biogas; biomass production; fertilization autonomy; greenhouse gas assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; SORGHUM BIOMASS; EMISSIONS; QUALITY; BALANCE; YIELD;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2021435
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Bioenergy, currently the largest renewable energy source in the EU (64% of the total renewable energy consumption), has sparked great interest to meet the 32% renewable resources for the 2030 bioeconomy goal. The design of innovative cropping systems informed by bioeconomy imperatives requires the evaluate of the effects of introducing crops for bioenergy into conventional crop rotations. This study aimed to assess the impacts of changes in conventional cropping systems in mixed dairy cattle farms redesigned to introduce bioenergy crops either by increasing the biomass production through an increase of cover crops, while keeping main feed/food crops, or by substituting food crops with an increase of the crop rotation length. The assessment is based on the comparison between conventional and innovative systems oriented to feed and biogas production, with and without tillage, to evaluate their agri-environmental performances (biomass production, nitrogen fertilization autonomy, greenhouse gas emissions and biogas production). The result showed higher values in the biogas cropping system than in the conventional and feed ones for all indicators, biomass productivity (27% and 20% higher, respectively), nitrogen fertilization autonomy (26% and 73% higher, respectively), methanogenic potential (77% and 41% higher, respectively) and greenhouse gas emissions (15% and 3% higher, respectively). There were no negative impacts of no-till compared to the tillage practice, for all tested variables. The biogas cropping system showed a better potential in terms of agri-environmental performance, although its greenhouse gas emissions were higher. Consequently, it would be appropriate to undertake a multicriteria assessment integrating agri-environmental, economic and social performances. (C) The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 294
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative environmental and economic life cycle assessment of phytoremediation of dredged sediment using Arundo Donax, integrated with biomass to bioenergy valorization chain
    Soleimani, Tara
    Sordes, Flo
    Techer, Isabelle
    Junqua, Guillaume
    Hayek, Mahmoud
    Salgues, Marie
    Souche, Jean-Claude
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 903
  • [32] Tree biomass, resource use and crop productivity in agri-horti-silvicultural systems in the dry region of Rajasthan, India
    Singh, Bilas
    Bishnoi, Mahipal
    Baloch, Mana Ram
    Singh, Genda
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2014, 60 (08) : 1031 - 1049
  • [33] Alternative cropping systems and optimized management practices for saving groundwater and enhancing economic and environmental sustainability
    Rathore, Vijay Singh
    Nathawat, Narayan Singh
    Bhardwaj, Seema
    Yadav, Bhagirath Mal
    Santra, Priyabrata
    Kumar, Mahesh
    Shekhawat, Ravindra Singh
    Reager, Madan Lal
    Yadav, Shish Ram
    Lal, Banwari
    Yadava, Narendra Dev
    Singh, Jai Prakash
    Kumar, Praveen
    Bhaskar, Suryanarayan
    Yadav, Om Parkash
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 272
  • [34] Optimizing nitrogen application rates to maximize productivity while reducing environmental risk by regulating nitrogen and water utilization in mixed cropping systems
    Wang, Bin
    Deng, Jianqiang
    Wang, Tengfei
    Zhang, Yiyin
    Lan, Jian
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2024, 303
  • [35] Environmental and economic assessment of integrated systems for dairy manure treatment coupled with algae bioenergy production
    Zhang, Yongli
    White, Mark A.
    Colosi, Lisa M.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 130 : 486 - 494
  • [36] Roundwood and bioenergy production from forestry: Environmental impact assessment considering different logging systems
    Proto, Andrea Rosario
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Macri, Giorgio
    Zimbalatti, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 165 : 1485 - 1498
  • [37] Biomass production and dry matter partitioning of processing tomato under organic vs conventional cropping systems in a Mediterranean environment
    Ronga, Domenico
    Zaccardelli, Massimo
    Lovelli, Stella
    Perrone, Domenico
    Francia, Enrico
    Milc, Justyna
    Ulrici, Alessandro
    Pecchioni, Nicola
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2017, 224 : 163 - 170
  • [38] Cultivating Ciona intestinalis to counteract marine eutrophication: Environmental assessment of a marine biomass based bioenergy and biofertilizer production system
    Hackl, Roman
    Hansson, Julia
    Noren, Fredrik
    Stenberg, Olle
    Olshammar, Mikael
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 124 : 103 - 113
  • [39] Environmental performance of commercial beef production systems utilizing conventional productivity-enhancing technologies
    Aboagye, Isaac A.
    Cordeiro, Marcos R. C.
    McAllister, Tim A.
    May, Matt L.
    Hannon, Sherry J.
    Booker, Calvin W.
    Parr, Sandi L.
    Schunicht, Oliver C.
    Burciaga-Robles, Luis O.
    Grimson, Tracey M.
    Boonstra, Emily
    Mengistu, Genet F.
    Fulawka, Deanne L.
    Ominski, Kim H.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 6 (03)
  • [40] A biotechnological roadmap for decarbonization systems combined into bioenergy production: Prelude of environmental life-cycle assessment
    Yaashikaa, P. R.
    Kumar, P. Senthil
    Saravanan, A.
    Karishma, S.
    Rangasamy, Gayathri
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2023, 329