AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS PROMOTING BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY

被引:3
|
作者
Kervroedan, Lea [1 ]
Houben, David [1 ]
Guidet, Julien [1 ]
Denier, Julia [1 ]
Dulaurent, Anne-Maimiti [1 ]
Marraccini, Elisa [2 ,3 ]
Deligey, Amandine [2 ,4 ]
Journel, Charlotte [4 ]
Lamerre, Justine [4 ]
Faucon, Michel-Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, AGHYLE SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[2] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, InTerACT 2018 C102, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Agrotransfert Ressources & Terr, 2 Chaussee Brunehaut, F-80200 Estrees Mons, France
关键词
alternative cropping systems; bioeconomy; biogas; biomass production; fertilization autonomy; greenhouse gas assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; SORGHUM BIOMASS; EMISSIONS; QUALITY; BALANCE; YIELD;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2021435
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Bioenergy, currently the largest renewable energy source in the EU (64% of the total renewable energy consumption), has sparked great interest to meet the 32% renewable resources for the 2030 bioeconomy goal. The design of innovative cropping systems informed by bioeconomy imperatives requires the evaluate of the effects of introducing crops for bioenergy into conventional crop rotations. This study aimed to assess the impacts of changes in conventional cropping systems in mixed dairy cattle farms redesigned to introduce bioenergy crops either by increasing the biomass production through an increase of cover crops, while keeping main feed/food crops, or by substituting food crops with an increase of the crop rotation length. The assessment is based on the comparison between conventional and innovative systems oriented to feed and biogas production, with and without tillage, to evaluate their agri-environmental performances (biomass production, nitrogen fertilization autonomy, greenhouse gas emissions and biogas production). The result showed higher values in the biogas cropping system than in the conventional and feed ones for all indicators, biomass productivity (27% and 20% higher, respectively), nitrogen fertilization autonomy (26% and 73% higher, respectively), methanogenic potential (77% and 41% higher, respectively) and greenhouse gas emissions (15% and 3% higher, respectively). There were no negative impacts of no-till compared to the tillage practice, for all tested variables. The biogas cropping system showed a better potential in terms of agri-environmental performance, although its greenhouse gas emissions were higher. Consequently, it would be appropriate to undertake a multicriteria assessment integrating agri-environmental, economic and social performances. (C) The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 294
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems
    Adler, Paul R.
    Del Grosso, Stephen J.
    Parton, William J.
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (03) : 675 - 691
  • [22] Analysis of Differences in Productivity,Profitability and Soil Fertility Between Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems in the Tropics and Sub-tropics
    Te Pas C M
    Rees R M
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13 (10) : 2299 - 2310
  • [23] Analysis of Differences in Productivity, Profitability and Soil Fertility Between Organic and Conventional Cropping Systems in the Tropics and Sub-tropics
    Pas, Te C. M.
    Rees, R. M.
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2014, 13 (10) : 2299 - 2310
  • [24] Environmental assessment of CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems based on biomass combustion in comparison to conventional generation
    Maraver, Daniel
    Sin, Ana
    Sebastian, Fernando
    Royo, Javier
    ENERGY, 2013, 57 : 17 - 23
  • [25] Environmental impact assessment of different cropping systems of home-grown feed for milk production
    Zucali, Maddalena
    Bacenetti, Jacopo
    Tamburini, Alberto
    Nonini, Luca
    Sandrucci, Anna
    Bava, Luciana
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 172 : 3734 - 3746
  • [26] Trade-offs among agronomic, energetic, and environmental performance characteristics of corn and prairie bioenergy cropping systems
    Jarchow, Meghann E.
    Liebman, Matt
    Dhungel, Shashi
    Dietzel, Ranae
    Sundberg, David
    Anex, Robert P.
    Thompson, Michael L.
    Chua, Teresita
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2015, 7 (01): : 57 - 71
  • [27] Energy Efficiency of Conventional, Organic, and Alternative Cropping Systems for Food and Fuel at a Site in the US Midwest
    Gelfand, Ilya
    Snapp, Sieglinde S.
    Robertson, G. Philip
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (10) : 4006 - 4011
  • [28] Towards better understanding the economic and environmental sustainability of alternative agricultural cropping production systems through integrated modelling
    Liang, Yujie
    Brown, Paul J.
    Bajada, Christopher
    Pham, Hannah
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 479
  • [29] Comparison of organic and conventional cropping systems: A systematic review of life cycle assessment studies
    Boschiero, Martina
    De Laurentiis, Valeria
    Caldeira, Carla
    Sala, Serenella
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2023, 102
  • [30] Ecozone dynamics of crop residue biomass, macronutrient removals, replacement costs, and bioenergy potential in corn-soybean-winter wheat cropping systems in southern Ontario
    Nkoa, Roger
    Kendall, Katie
    Deen, Bill
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 94 (05) : 981 - 993