AGRI-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE BIOENERGY CROPPING SYSTEMS PROMOTING BIOMASS PRODUCTIVITY

被引:3
|
作者
Kervroedan, Lea [1 ]
Houben, David [1 ]
Guidet, Julien [1 ]
Denier, Julia [1 ]
Dulaurent, Anne-Maimiti [1 ]
Marraccini, Elisa [2 ,3 ]
Deligey, Amandine [2 ,4 ]
Journel, Charlotte [4 ]
Lamerre, Justine [4 ]
Faucon, Michel-Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, AGHYLE SFR Condorcet FR CNRS 3417, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[2] UniLaSalle Polytech Inst, InTerACT 2018 C102, 19 Rue Pierre Waguet, F-60026 Beauvais, France
[3] Univ Udine, Dept Agr Food Environm & Anim Sci, Via Sci 206, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[4] Agrotransfert Ressources & Terr, 2 Chaussee Brunehaut, F-80200 Estrees Mons, France
关键词
alternative cropping systems; bioeconomy; biogas; biomass production; fertilization autonomy; greenhouse gas assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; SORGHUM BIOMASS; EMISSIONS; QUALITY; BALANCE; YIELD;
D O I
10.15302/J-FASE-2021435
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Bioenergy, currently the largest renewable energy source in the EU (64% of the total renewable energy consumption), has sparked great interest to meet the 32% renewable resources for the 2030 bioeconomy goal. The design of innovative cropping systems informed by bioeconomy imperatives requires the evaluate of the effects of introducing crops for bioenergy into conventional crop rotations. This study aimed to assess the impacts of changes in conventional cropping systems in mixed dairy cattle farms redesigned to introduce bioenergy crops either by increasing the biomass production through an increase of cover crops, while keeping main feed/food crops, or by substituting food crops with an increase of the crop rotation length. The assessment is based on the comparison between conventional and innovative systems oriented to feed and biogas production, with and without tillage, to evaluate their agri-environmental performances (biomass production, nitrogen fertilization autonomy, greenhouse gas emissions and biogas production). The result showed higher values in the biogas cropping system than in the conventional and feed ones for all indicators, biomass productivity (27% and 20% higher, respectively), nitrogen fertilization autonomy (26% and 73% higher, respectively), methanogenic potential (77% and 41% higher, respectively) and greenhouse gas emissions (15% and 3% higher, respectively). There were no negative impacts of no-till compared to the tillage practice, for all tested variables. The biogas cropping system showed a better potential in terms of agri-environmental performance, although its greenhouse gas emissions were higher. Consequently, it would be appropriate to undertake a multicriteria assessment integrating agri-environmental, economic and social performances. (C) The Author(s) 2022. Published by Higher Education Press.
引用
收藏
页码:284 / 294
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative productivity of alternative cellulosic bioenergy cropping systems in the North Central USA
    Sanford, Gregg R.
    Oates, Lawrence G.
    Jasrotia, Poonam
    Thelen, Kurt D.
    Robertson, G. Philip
    Jackson, Randall D.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 216 : 344 - 355
  • [2] Agri-environmental implications of N- and P-based manure application to perennial and annual cropping systems
    Kokulan, Vivekananthan
    Ige, Dupe
    Akinremi, Olalekan O.
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2022, 122 (02) : 205 - 218
  • [3] Agri-environmental assessment of extractable soil phosphorus at the regional scale
    Castoldi, N.
    Stein, A.
    Bechini, L.
    NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2009, 56 (04) : 325 - 343
  • [4] Topographic and soil influences on root productivity of three bioenergy cropping systems
    Ontl, Todd A.
    Hofmockel, Kirsten S.
    Cambardella, Cynthia A.
    Schulte, Lisa A.
    Kolka, Randall K.
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2013, 199 (03) : 727 - 737
  • [5] Bioenergy for regions - alternative cropping systems and optimisation of local heat supply
    Konrad, C.
    Mast, B.
    Graeff-Hoenninger, S.
    Claupein, W.
    Bolduan, R.
    Skok, J.
    Strittmatter, J.
    Brule, M.
    Goettlicher, G.
    ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY III, 2011, 143 : 291 - +
  • [6] Environmental and economic tradeoffs of alternative cropping systems
    Koo, S
    Williams, JR
    Schurle, BW
    Langemeier, MR
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE, 2000, 15 (04): : 35 - 58
  • [7] Genotypic diversity effects on biomass production in native perennial bioenergy cropping systems
    Morris, Geoffrey P.
    Hu, Zhenbin
    Grabowski, Paul P.
    Borevitz, Justin O.
    de Graaff, Marie-Anne
    Miller, R. Michael
    Jastrow, Julie D.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (05): : 1000 - 1014
  • [8] Biomass productivity and radiation utilisation of innovative cropping systems for biorefinery
    Manevski, Kiril
    Laerke, Poul E.
    Jiao, Xiurong
    Santhome, Sanmohan
    Jorgensen, Uffe
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2017, 233 : 250 - 264
  • [9] ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) OF ALTERNATIVE POTATO CROPPING SYSTEMS IN HAMADAN PROVINCE, IRAN
    Rezaei, M. E.
    Barmaki, M.
    Veisi, H.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (01): : 535 - 552
  • [10] Environmental and energy assessment of biomass residues to biochar as fuel: A brief review with recommendations for future bioenergy systems
    Lee, Mengshan
    Lin, Yi-Li
    Chiueh, Pei-Te
    Den, Walter
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 251