Competence effects for choices involving gains and losses

被引:22
作者
de Lara Resende, Jose Guilherme [2 ]
Wu, George [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Booth Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Brasilia, Dept Econ, BR-70919970 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
Uncertainty; Decision weighting function; Ambiguity; Knowledge; Competence effect; Gains; Losses; EXPECTED UTILITY; PROSPECT-THEORY; AMBIGUITY AVERSION; DECISION WEIGHTS; PROBABILITY; RISK; PREFERENCE; REPRESENTATION; UNCERTAINTY; ELICITATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11166-010-9089-6
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We investigate how choices for uncertain gain and loss prospects are affected by the decision maker's perceived level of knowledge about the underlying domain of uncertainty. Specifically, we test whether Heath and Tversky's (J Risk Uncertain 4:5-28, 1991) competence hypothesis extends from gains to losses. We predict that the commonly-observed preference for high knowledge over low knowledge prospects for gains reverses for losses. We employ an empirical setup in which participants make hypothetical choices between gain or loss prospects in which the outcome depends on whether a high or low knowledge event occurs. We infer decision weighting functions for high and low knowledge events from choices using a representative agent preference model. For gains, we replicate the results of Kilka and Weber (Manage Sci 47:1712-1726, 2001), finding that decision makers are more attracted to choices that they feel more knowledgeable about. However, for losses, we find limited support for our extension of the competence effect.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 132
页数:24
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]   Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty [J].
Abdellaoui, M ;
Vossmann, F ;
Weber, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (09) :1384-1399
[3]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1988, J. Behav. Decis. Mak., DOI [DOI 10.1002/BDM.3960010303, 10.1002/bdm.3960010303]
[5]  
Baillon Aurelien, AM EC REV IN PRESS
[6]  
BALLINGER T, 1997, ECON J, V106, P1090
[7]   Choices under ambiguity with familiar and unfamiliar outcomes [J].
Basili, M ;
Chateauneuf, A ;
Fontini, F .
THEORY AND DECISION, 2005, 58 (02) :195-207
[8]   WHAT PRICE AMBIGUITY - OR THE ROLE OF AMBIGUITY IN DECISION-MAKING [J].
BECKER, SW ;
BROWNSON, FO .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1964, 72 (01) :62-73
[9]   Constructive consumer choice processes [J].
Bettman, JR ;
Luce, MF ;
Payne, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1998, 25 (03) :187-217
[10]   Violations of branch independence in choices between gambles [J].
Birnbaum, MH ;
McIntosh, WR .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 67 (01) :91-110