SalivaSTAT: Direct-PCR and Pooling of Saliva Samples Collected in Healthcare and Community Setting for SARS-CoV-2 Mass Surveillance

被引:18
作者
Sahajpal, Nikhil S. [1 ]
Mondal, Ashis K. [1 ]
Ananth, Sudha [1 ]
Njau, Allan [2 ]
Ahluwalia, Pankaj [1 ]
Newnam, Gary [3 ]
Lozoya-Colinas, Adriana [3 ]
Hud, Nicholas V. [3 ]
Kota, Vamsi [4 ]
Ross, Ted M. [5 ]
Reid, Michelle D. [6 ]
Fulzele, Sadanand [7 ]
Chaubey, Alka [1 ,8 ]
Hegde, Madhuri [9 ]
Rojiani, Amyn M. [1 ]
Kolhe, Ravindra [1 ]
机构
[1] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, Dept Pathol, Augusta, GA 30901 USA
[2] Aga Khan Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Nairobi 3027000100, Kenya
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Chem & Biochem, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, Dept Med, Augusta, GA 30901 USA
[5] Univ Georgia, Ctr Vaccines & Immunol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[6] Emory Univ, Dept Pathol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[7] Augusta Univ, Med Coll Georgia, Ctr Hlth Aging, Augusta, GA 30901 USA
[8] Bionano Genom Inc, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[9] PerkinElmer, Global Lab Serv, Waltham, MA 02451 USA
关键词
saliva; extraction-free; RT-PCR; pooling; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics11050904
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Limitations of widespread current COVID-19 diagnostic testing exist in both the pre-analytical and analytical stages. To alleviate these limitations, we developed a universal saliva processing protocol (SalivaSTAT) that would enable an extraction-free RT-PCR test using commercially available RT-PCR kits. Methods: We optimized saliva collection devices, heat-shock treatment, and homogenization. Saliva samples (879) previously tested using the FDA-EUA method were reevaluated with the optimized SalivaSTAT protocol using two widely available commercial RT-PCR kits. A five-sample pooling strategy was evaluated as per FDA guidelines. Results: Saliva collection (done without any media) showed performance comparable to that of the FDA-EUA method. The SalivaSTAT protocol was optimized by incubating saliva samples at 95 degrees C for 30-min and homogenization, followed by RT-PCR assay. The clinical sample evaluation of 630 saliva samples using the SalivaSTAT protocol with PerkinElmer (600-samples) and CDC (30-samples) RT-PCR assay achieved positive (PPA) and negative percent agreements (NPAs) of 95.0% and 100%, respectively. The LoD was established as similar to 60-180 copies/mL by absolute quantification. Furthermore, a five-sample-pooling evaluation using 250 saliva samples achieved a PPA and NPA of 92% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: We have optimized an extraction-free RT-PCR assay for saliva samples that demonstrates comparable performance to FDA-EUA assay (Extraction and RT-PCR).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Impacts of Rumors and Conspiracy Theories Surrounding COVID-19 on Preparedness Programs [J].
Ali, Inayat .
DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2022, 16 (01) :310-315
[2]  
Ananth, 2020, SALIVAALL CLIN VALID, DOI [10.1101/2020.08.26.20182816, DOI 10.1101/2020.08.26.20182816]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, CLIN INFECT DIS, DOI DOI 10.3346/JKMS.2020.35.E195
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, NATURE, DOI DOI 10.1001/JAMA.2020.3786
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2020, CLIN INFECT DIS, DOI DOI 10.3390/GENES11060664
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, LANCET INFECT DIS, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JINF.2020.04.005
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1951, NAT COMMUN, DOI DOI 10.1021/IE50501A040
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, J INFECT DIS, DOI DOI 10.1038/S41467-020-18611-5
[9]  
Becker D, 2020, MEDRXIV, DOI 10.1101/2020.05.11.20092338
[10]   COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic [J].
Bedford, Juliet ;
Enria, Delia ;
Giesecke, Johan ;
Heymann, David L. ;
Ihekweazu, Chikwe ;
Kobinger, Gary ;
Lane, H. Clifford ;
Memish, Ziad ;
Oh, Myoung-don ;
Sall, Amadou Alpha ;
Schuchat, Anne ;
Ungchusak, Kumnuan ;
Wieler, Lothar H. .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10229) :1015-1018