A survey of comparative business process modeling approaches

被引:0
作者
Lu, Ruopeng [1 ]
Sadiq, Shazia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS | 2007年 / 4439卷
关键词
business process management; workflows; business process modeling and analysis; rule-based workflows; graph-based workflows;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
There has been a huge influx of business process modeling langu ages as business process management (BPM) and process-aware information systems continue to expand into various business domains. The origins of process modeling languages are quite diverse, although two dominant approaches can be observed; one based on graphical models, and the other based on rule specifications. However, at this time, there is no report in literature that specifically targets a comparative analysis of these two approaches, on aspects such as the relative areas of application, power of expression, and limitations. In this paper we have attempted to address this question. We will present both a survey of the two approaches as well as a critical and comparative analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / +
页数:4
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
BAE J, 2004, IEEE T KNOWLEDGE DAT, V16
[2]  
Cardoso J., 2005, WORKFLOW HDB, P199
[3]  
CASATI F, 1996, SPECIFICATION LANGUA
[4]  
CASATI F, 1995, WORKFLOW HDB
[5]  
CASATI F, 1995, P 14 INT C OBJ OR EN
[6]  
*DELPH GROUP, 2005, BPM 2005 MARK MIL RE
[7]  
ELLIS CA, 1993, P 14 INT C APL THEOR
[8]   RULE-BASED SYSTEMS [J].
HAYESROTH, F .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1985, 28 (09) :921-932
[9]  
HERBST H, 1994, METHODS ASS TOOLS IN
[10]  
*ILOG, 2006, ILOG COMP BUS PROC M