Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, active comparator, phase III trial

被引:42
作者
Chen, Yu Hong [1 ,5 ]
Huang, Chien-Ning [2 ]
Cho, Young Min [3 ]
Li, Pengfei [4 ]
Gu, Liqun [5 ]
Wang, Feng [5 ]
Yang, Jun
Wang, Wei Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Chung Shan Med Univ Hosp, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Takeda Dev Ctr Asia, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceut Co Ltd, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
dulaglutide; glimepiride; glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HbA1c; type; 2; diabetes; ONCE-WEEKLY DULAGLUTIDE; PEPTIDE-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST; DRUG-NAIVE PATIENTS; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; GLP-1; ANALOG; OPEN-LABEL; METFORMIN; LIRAGLUTIDE; EXENATIDE; SITAGLIPTIN;
D O I
10.1111/dom.13340
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Materials and methods: In this phase III, multinational, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, 26-week study, patients with inadequate glycaemic control were randomized 1:1:1 to once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 or 0.75 mg or daily glimepiride (1-3 mg/d). The primary endpoint was assessment of the non-inferiority of dulaglutide (1.5 mg), as measured by change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), compared with glimepiride using a 0.4% non-inferiority margin. Results: A total of 737 patients were randomized (dulaglutide 1.5 mg, n = 244; dulaglutide 0.75 mg, n = 248; glimepiride, n = 245). At week 26, both doses of dulaglutide were non-inferior and also superior to glimepiride for HbA1c reduction from baseline with a least squares mean difference of -6.34 mmol/mol (95% confidence interval [CI] -8.31, -4.26) or -0.58% (95% CI -0.76, -0.39) for dulaglutide 1.5 mg and -3.50 mmol/mol (95% CI -5.47, -1.42) or -0.32% (95% CI -0.50, -0.13) for dulaglutide 0.75 mg (P < .001). A greater proportion of patients in the dulaglutide 1.5 mg group achieved the HbA1c target of <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%) compared with the glimepiride group (74.1% vs 57.4%; P < .001). The mean body weight decreased (P < .005) and total hypoglycaemia rates were lower (P < .001) in the dulaglutide groups compared with the glimepiride group. The most common drug-related adverse events in both dulaglutide groups (>= 5% of patients) included diarrhoea, nausea, increased lipase, decreased appetite, abdominal distension and vomiting. Conclusions:Dulaglutide (both doses) demonstrated superior glycaemic control vs glimepiride, with a favourable tolerability and safety profile in East-Asian patients with T2D.
引用
收藏
页码:2121 / 2130
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Signaling in Acinar Cells Causes Growth-Dependent Release of Pancreatic Enzymes
    Albrechtsen, Nicolai J. Wewer
    Albrechtsen, Reidar
    Bremholm, Lasse
    Svendsen, Berit
    Kuhre, Rune E.
    Poulsen, Steen S.
    Christiansen, Charlotte B.
    Jensen, Elisa P.
    Janus, Charlotte
    Hilsted, Linda
    Deacon, Carolyn F.
    Hartmann, Bolette
    Holst, Jens J.
    [J]. CELL REPORTS, 2016, 17 (11): : 2845 - 2856
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V277, P925
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, TRUL DUL INJ
  • [4] Once-weekly dulaglutide versus bedtime insulin glargine, both in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes (AWARD-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority study
    Blonde, Lawrence
    Jendle, Johan
    Gross, Jorge
    Woo, Vincent
    Jiang, Honghua
    Fahrbach, Jessie L.
    Milicevic, Zvonko
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 385 (9982) : 2057 - 2066
  • [5] Lower baseline glycemia reduces apparent oral agent glucose-lowering efficacy - A meta-regression analysis
    Bloomgarden, Zachary T.
    Dodis, Regina
    Viscoli, Catherine M.
    Holmboe, Eric S.
    Inzucchi, Silvio E.
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2006, 29 (09) : 2137 - 2139
  • [6] Baseline differences in A1C explain apparent differences in efficacy of sitagliptin, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone
    Chapell, R.
    Gould, A. L.
    Alexander, C. M.
    [J]. DIABETES OBESITY & METABOLISM, 2009, 11 (11) : 1009 - 1016
  • [7] Type 2 diabetes
    Chatterjee, Sudesna
    Khunti, Kamlesh
    Davies, Melanie J.
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10085) : 2239 - 2251
  • [8] Davies Melanie J, 2002, Curr Med Res Opin, V18 Suppl 1, ps22, DOI 10.1185/030079902125000200
  • [9] Mixtures of multiple testing procedures for gatekeeping applications in clinical trials
    Dmitrienko, Alex
    Tamhane, Ajit C.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (13) : 1473 - 1488
  • [10] Drugs, 2017, GLIM IND US