Assessing the environmental sustainability of grass silage and cattle slurry for biogas production

被引:21
作者
Beausang, Ciara [1 ]
McDonnell, Kevin [1 ]
Murphy, Fionnuala [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Biosyst & Food Engn, Room 3-29, Dublin 4, Ireland
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Consequential life cycle assessment; Biomethane; Bioenergy; Agricultural feedstocks; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CO-DIGESTION; ENERGY; MANURE; CONSEQUENCES; PERFORMANCE; FUTURE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126838
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Grass silage and cattle slurry have been identified as potential significant resources for biogas produc-tion. While a higher proportion of grass silage enables a higher specific methane yield to be achieved, there are concerns that using high shares of grass silage may have negative environmental impacts. Previous studies which consider grass as a feedstock have focused on environmental sustainability in the context of greenhouse gas mitigation. However, there is a potential risk of burden shifting occurring if other environmental impacts, such as eutrophication and terrestrial acidification, are not taken into account. A consequential life cycle assessment was conducted to examine mono-digestion of cattle slurry and co-digestion with grass silage in different ratios on a volatile solids (VS) basis. The prior uses of the feedstocks were considered, along with the processes displaced by the biogas and digestate produced. The net environmental impact varied according to the proportion of silage and slurry digested. Higher environmental burdens were observed for mixes with a greater ratio of grass silage to slurry. The op-timum environmental performance for the baseline scenario was observed at a VS ratio of 0.4:0.6 for silage and slurry, where there is a net reduction for all impact categories considered. The choice of marginal technologies that are displaced has a significant influence on the results, as have the as-sumptions about how the grass silage is sourced. This study provides greater insight into the environ-mental impacts of co-digesting an energy crop with animal manure in varying proportions. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 70 条
[51]   Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe [J].
Scarlat, Nicolae ;
Dallemand, Jean-Francois ;
Fahl, Fernando .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 129 :457-472
[52]   Total methane emission rates and losses from 23 biogas plants [J].
Scheutz, Charlotte ;
Fredenslund, Anders M. .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 97 :38-46
[53]  
SEAI, 2016, COMBINED HEAT POWER
[54]  
SEAI, 2016, BIOENERGY SUPPLY IRE
[55]   Environmental impacts of alternative agricultural uses of poorly drained farm land in Ireland [J].
Sharma, Pooja ;
Humphreys, James ;
Holden, Nicholas M. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 637 :120-131
[56]   Environmental balance of the UK biogas sector: An evaluation by consequential life cycle assessment [J].
Styles, David ;
Dominguez, Eduardo Mesa ;
Chadwick, Dave .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 560 :241-253
[57]  
Teagasc, 2019, ANAL ABATEMENT POTEN
[58]  
Teagasc, 2016, SECTORAL ROAD MAP DA
[59]  
Teagasc, 2016, CONCENTRATE FEEDS
[60]  
Teagasc, 2019, NATL FARM SURVEY 201