Comparison of weekly methotrexate regimen versus methotrexate folinic acid 8-day regimen for treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia

被引:1
作者
Korkmaz, Vakkas [1 ]
Sunar, Veli [2 ]
Akar, Serra [1 ]
Alinca, Cihat Murat [1 ]
Arik, Zafer [3 ]
Boran, Nurettin [1 ]
Ozdal, Bulent [4 ]
Ustun, Yaprak Engin [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Womens Hlth Training & Res Ho, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Zekai Tahir Burak Womens Hlth Training & Res Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Hacettepe Univ, Inst Canc, Dept Med Oncol, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Zekai Tahir Burak Womens Hlth Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Ankara, Turkey
[5] Univ Hlth Sci, Fac Med, Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Womens Hlth Training & Res Ho, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
gestational trophoblastic neoplasms; methotrexate; response rate; WEEKLY INTRAMUSCULAR METHOTREXATE; DISEASE; CHEMOTHERAPY; MANAGEMENT; CHORIOCARCINOMA; RESISTANCE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1111/ajco.13623
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim We aimed to compare weekly methotrexate (MTX) regimen and methotrexate-folinic acid (MTX-FA) 8-day regimen in the first line treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). Methods The study included 73 patients with low-risk GTN according to FIGO risk score (FIGO risk score < 7). All patients received either weekly MTX (30-50 mg/m(2) intramuscular weekly) or MTX-FA 8-day (MTX 1 mg/kg IV on day 1, 3, 5, and 7, FA 15 mg orally on day 2, 4, 6, and 8 given 24 h after each MTX dose, every 14 days) regimens in the first-line treatment of low-risk GTN. The baseline clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were analyzed retrospectively. Results The median age of all patients was 29 (18-51) years, and the median FIGO risk score was 3 (1-6). Of the patients recruited, 53 received MTX-FA 8-day, and 20 had MTX weekly regimens. There was a significant difference between the two groups with respect to FIGO risk scores (3 [1-6] vs. 2 [1-5], p = 0.023, MTX-FA 8-day vs. MTX weekly, respectively). The complete response rate was significantly higher in MTX-FA 8-day group compared to MTX weekly group (83% [44/53] vs. 60% [12/20] p = 0.038). In univariate and multivariate regression analyses, only presence of lung metastasis was found to be an independent risk factor for treatment resistance (OR: 3.959, 95% CI 1.105-14.179, p = 0.035). Conclusion MTX-FA 8-day regimen is more effective than weekly MTX regimen in the first line treatment of low-risk GTN including patients even with higher FIGO risk scores. Treatment resistance may develop especially in patients with lung metastasis.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 332
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Relapse rates after two versus three consolidation courses of methotrexate in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Lybol, C.
    Sweep, F. C. G. J.
    Harvey, R.
    Mitchell, H.
    Short, D.
    Thomas, C. M. G.
    Ottevanger, P. B.
    Savage, P. M.
    Massuger, L. F. A. G.
    Seckl, M. J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (03) : 576 - 579
  • [22] Comparison of pulse methotrexate and pulse dactinomycin in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Gilani, MM
    Yarandi, F
    Eftekhar, Z
    Hanjani, P
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 45 (02) : 161 - 164
  • [23] Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia in Manitoba Experience With Alternating Methotrexate and Dactinomycin
    Carlson, Vanessa
    Walters, Leslea
    Lambert, Pascal
    Dean, Erin
    Lotocki, Robert
    Altman, Alon D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 (08) : 1448 - 1452
  • [24] Actinomycin D for Methotrexate-Failed Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Lurain, John R.
    Chapman-Davis, Eloise
    Hoekstra, Anna V.
    Schink, Julian C.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 57 (7-8) : 283 - 287
  • [25] Five-Day Intravascular Methotrexate Versus Biweekly Actinomycin-D in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia A Clinical Randomized Trial
    Yarandi, Fariba
    Mousavi, Azamsadat
    Abbaslu, Fereshteh
    Aminimoghaddam, Soheila
    Nekuie, Sepideh
    Adabi, Khadijeh
    Hanjani, Parviz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 (05) : 971 - 976
  • [26] Predictive factors of relapse in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients successfully treated with methotrexate alone
    Couder, Florence
    Massardier, Jerome
    You, Benoit
    Abbas, Fatima
    Hajri, Touria
    Lotz, Jean-Pierre
    Schott, Anne-Marie
    Golfier, Francois
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 215 (01) : 80.e1 - 80.e7
  • [27] Pulse methotrexate versus pulse actinomycin D in the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Yarandi, Fariba
    Eftekhar, Zahra
    Shojaei, Hadi
    Kanani, Soheyla
    Sharifi, Ali
    Hanjani, Parviz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2008, 103 (01) : 33 - 37
  • [28] Efficacy of Combination Therapy with Actinomycin D and Methotrexate in the Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Kang, Hai-Li
    Zhao, Qun
    Yang, Shu-Li
    Duan, Wei
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 2019, 64 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [29] Comparison of pulsed actinomycin D versus 5-day methotrexate for the treatment of low-risk gestational trophoblastic disease
    Mousavi, Azamsadat
    Cheraghi, Fatemeh
    Yarandi, Fariba
    Gilani, Mitra Modaress
    Shojaei, Hadi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2012, 116 (01) : 39 - 42
  • [30] Initial Diagnosis and Treatment of Low-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Alimena, Stephanie
    Elias, Kevin M.
    Horowitz, Neil S.
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    HEMATOLOGY-ONCOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 38 (06) : 1233 - 1244