Effect of Bar-Code Technology on the Safety of Medication Administration.

被引:336
作者
Poon, Eric G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Keohane, Carol A.
Yoon, Catherine S.
Ditmore, Matthew
Bane, Anne
Levtzion-Korach, Osnat
Moniz, Thomas
Rothschild, Jeffrey M. [2 ]
Kachalia, Allen B. [2 ]
Hayes, Judy [4 ]
Churchill, William W.
Lipsitz, Stuart
Whittemore, Anthony D. [2 ]
Bates, David W. [2 ,3 ]
Gandhi, Tejal K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Med Primary Care, Boston, MA 02120 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Partners Informat Syst, Boston, MA USA
[4] Faulkner Hosp, Boston, MA USA
关键词
ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS; PHYSICIAN ORDER ENTRY; PATIENT SAFETY; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; ERRORS; PREVENTION; SYSTEMS; CARE; HOSPITALS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1056/NEJMsa0907115
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Serious medication errors are common in hospitals and often occur during order transcription or administration of medication. To help prevent such errors, technology has been developed to verify medications by incorporating bar-code verification technology within an electronic medication-administration system (bar-code eMAR). Methods: We conducted a before-and-after, quasi-experimental study in an academic medical center that was implementing the bar-code eMAR. We assessed rates of errors in order transcription and medication administration on units before and after implementation of the bar-code eMAR. Errors that involved early or late administration of medications were classified as timing errors and all others as nontiming errors. Two clinicians reviewed the errors to determine their potential to harm patients and classified those that could be harmful as potential adverse drug events. Results: We observed 14,041 medication administrations and reviewed 3082 order transcriptions. Observers noted 776 nontiming errors in medication administration on units that did not use the bar-code eMAR (an 11.5% error rate) versus 495 such errors on units that did use it (a 6.8% error rate) -- a 41.4% relative reduction in errors (P<0.001). The rate of potential adverse drug events (other than those associated with timing errors) fell from 3.1% without the use of the bar-code eMAR to 1.6% with its use, representing a 50.8% relative reduction (P<0.001). The rate of timing errors in medication administration fell by 27.3% (P<0.001), but the rate of potential adverse drug events associated with timing errors did not change significantly. Transcription errors occurred at a rate of 6.1% on units that did not use the bar-code eMAR but were completely eliminated on units that did use it. Conclusions: Use of the bar-code eMAR substantially reduced the rate of errors in order transcription and in medication administration as well as potential adverse drug events, although it did not eliminate such errors. Our data show that the bar-code eMAR is an important intervention to improve medication safety. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00243373.) N Engl J Med 2010;362:1698-707.
引用
收藏
页码:1698 / 1707
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Medication errors observed in 36 health care facilities
    Barker, KN
    Flynn, EA
    Pepper, GA
    Bates, DW
    Mikeal, RL
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (16) : 1897 - 1903
  • [2] Patient safety: Improving safety with information technology
    Bates, DW
    Gawande, AA
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (25) : 2526 - 2534
  • [3] Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors
    Bates, DW
    Leape, LL
    Cullen, DJ
    Laird, N
    Petersen, LA
    Teich, JM
    Burdick, E
    Hickey, M
    Kleefield, S
    Shea, B
    Vander Vliet, M
    Seger, DL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (15): : 1311 - 1316
  • [4] Using information technology to reduce rates of medication errors in hospitals
    Bates, DW
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7237) : 788 - 791
  • [5] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MEDICATION ERRORS AND ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS
    BATES, DW
    BOYLE, DL
    VLIET, MVV
    SCHNEIDER, J
    LEAPE, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 10 (04) : 199 - 205
  • [6] INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS AND POTENTIAL ADVERSE DRUG EVENTS - IMPLICATIONS FOR PREVENTION
    BATES, DW
    CULLEN, DJ
    LAIRD, N
    PETERSEN, LA
    SMALL, SD
    SERVI, D
    LAFFEL, G
    SWEITZER, BJ
    SHEA, BF
    HALLISEY, R
    VANDERVLIET, M
    NEMESKAL, R
    LEAPE, LL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (01): : 29 - 34
  • [7] INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I
    BRENNAN, TA
    LEAPE, LL
    LAIRD, NM
    HEBERT, L
    LOCALIO, AR
    LAWTHERS, AG
    NEWHOUSE, JP
    WEILER, PC
    HIATT, HH
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) : 370 - 376
  • [8] Errors Prevented by and Associated with Bar-Code Medication Administration Systems
    Cochran, Gary L.
    Jones, Katherine J.
    Brockman, John
    Skinner, Anne
    Hicks, Rodney W.
    [J]. JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2007, 33 (05) : 293 - 301
  • [9] DiConsiglio John, 2008, Mater Manag Health Care, V17, P26
  • [10] FLYNN EA, 1999, MED ERRORS CAUSES PR