Amniotic fluid index in normal pregnancy: An assessment of gestation specific reference values among Indian women

被引:10
作者
Khadilkar, SS
Desai, SS
Tayade, SM
Purandare, CN
机构
[1] Grant Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bombay, Maharashtra, India
[2] Grant Med Coll, Dept Radiol, Bombay, Maharashtra, India
[3] Cama & Albless Hosp, Bombay, Maharashtra, India
关键词
amniotic fluid index; normal pregnancy; reference range;
D O I
10.1046/j.1341-8076.2003.00089.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To obtain a gestational reference range for the amniotic fluid index (AFI) among Indian women. Methods: An analysis of AFI estimations was undertaken in 517 Indian women with normal pregnancy between 16 and 42 weeks of gestation. It was a prospective, cross-sectional study conducted in a university teaching hospital. Women with fetal anomalies, pregnancy-induced hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and other maternal complications were excluded from the study. The median, the 5th and the 95th percentile values were calculated for each gestational week and these values were compared with other studies. Results: The median reached its peak at the 27th week of gestation. We observed similar to 6 cm as the lower limit of normal (5th percentile) and similar to 18 cm (95th percentile) as upper limit of normal AFI at term for our population, whereas in the Caucasian population, the values were similar to 7 cm and similar to 20 cm, respectively. All gestation specific AFI values were lower in the studied population of Indian women compared with other studies on Caucasian population (P < 0.01 for 5th percentile & P < 3.26 x 10(-7) for 95th percentile), but slightly higher than the Chinese population. Conclusion: Amniotic fluid index values differ in different populations. We standardized the reference values for normal AFI in Indian women. We found that they are lower in the population studied compared with reported values in the Caucasian population, but slightly higher than the Chinese population.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 141
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Four-quadrant assessment of gestational age-specific values of amniotic fluid volume in uncomplicated pregnancies [J].
Alley, MH ;
Hadjiev, A ;
Mazneikova, V ;
Dimitrov, A .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1998, 77 (03) :290-294
[2]  
Biswas A, 1997, J Obstet Gynaecol Res, V23, P63
[3]   THE INTRAUTERINE PONDERAL INDEX IN RELATION TO BIRTH-WEIGHT DISCORDANCE IN TWIN GESTATIONS [J].
BLICKSTEIN, I ;
MANOR, M ;
LEVI, R ;
GOLDCHMIT, R ;
WEISSMAN, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1995, 50 (03) :253-255
[4]   INTRAOBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY OF THE AMNIOTIC-FLUID INDEX [J].
BRUNER, JP ;
REED, GW ;
SARNO, AP ;
HARRINGTON, RA ;
GOODMAN, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1993, 168 (04) :1309-1313
[5]   Reproducibility of the amniotic fluid index: Its effect on clinical practice [J].
Chang, TC ;
Yeo, SH ;
Huang, HF ;
Leng, JH .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 6 (06) :416-420
[6]  
DELVALLE GO, 1994, J REPROD MED, V39, P869
[7]   Amniotic fluid index and perinatal morbidity [J].
DizonTownson, D ;
Kennedy, KA ;
Dildy, GA ;
Wu, J ;
Egger, M ;
Clark, SL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1996, 13 (04) :231-234
[8]   ULTRASOUND VOLUME MEASUREMENTS COMPARING A PROLATE ELLIPSOID METHOD WITH A PARALLEL PLANIMETRIC AREA METHOD AGAINST A KNOWN VOLUME [J].
GEIRSSON, RT ;
CHRISTIE, AD ;
PATEL, N .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1982, 10 (07) :329-332
[9]   PREDICTION OF INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION BY DETERMINATION OF TOTAL INTRAUTERINE VOLUME [J].
GOHARI, P ;
BERKOWITZ, RL ;
HOBBINS, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1977, 127 (03) :255-260
[10]   SONOGRAPHIC ESTIMATION OF AMNIOTIC-FLUID VOLUME - SUBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT VERSUS POCKET MEASUREMENTS [J].
GOLDSTEIN, RB ;
FILLY, RA .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1988, 7 (07) :363-369