Venous thromboembolism risk assessment of surgical patients in Southwest China using real-world data: establishment and evaluation of an improved venous thromboembolism risk model

被引:7
|
作者
Wang, Peng [1 ,5 ]
Wang, Yao [2 ]
Yuan, Zhaoying [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Fei [5 ]
Wang, Hongqian [5 ]
Li, Ying [5 ]
Wang, Chengliang [1 ]
Li, Linfeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Yidu Cloud Technol Inc, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Renmin Univ China, Ctr Appl Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Renmin Univ China, Sch Stat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Southwest Hosp, Med Big Data Ctr, Chongqing, Peoples R China
关键词
Venous thromboembolism; Risk assessment model; Caprini; Surgical patients; Machine learning; CLINICAL PRESENTATION; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; MAJOR SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; THROMBOSIS; CANCER; VALIDATION; CRITERION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-022-01795-9
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment in surgical patients is important for the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of patients. The commonly used Caprini model is limited by its inadequate ability to discriminate between risk stratums on the surgical population in southwest China and lengthy risk factors. The purpose of this study was to establish an improved VTE risk assessment model that is accurate and simple. Methods This study is based on the clinical data from 81,505 surgical patients hospitalized in the Southwest Hospital of China between January 1, 2019 and June 18, 2021. Among the population, 559 patients developed VTE. An improved VTE risk assessment model, SW-model, was established through Logistic Regression, with comparisons to both Caprini and Random Forest. Results The SW-model incorporated eight risk factors. The area under the curve (AUC) of SW-model (0.807 [0.758, 0.853], 0.804 [0.765, 0.840]), are significantly superior (p = 0.001 and p = 0.044) to those of the Caprini (0.705 [0.652, 0.757], 0.758 [0.719, 0795]) on two test sets, but inferior (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002) to Random Forest (0.854 [0.814, 0.890], 0.839 [0.806, 0.868]). In decision curve analysis, within threshold range from 0.015 to 0.04, the DCA curves of the SW-model are superior to Caprini and two default strategies. Conclusions The SW-model demonstrated a higher discriminative capability to distinguish VTE positive in surgical patients compared with the Caprini model. Compared to Random Forest, Logistic Regression based SW-model provided interpretability which is essential in guarantee the procedure of risk assessment transparent to clinicians.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk and the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients
    Cohen, AT
    Alikhan, R
    Arcelus, JI
    Bergmann, JF
    Haass, S
    Merli, G
    Spyropoulos, AC
    Tapson, VF
    Turpie, AGG
    THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2005, 94 (04) : 750 - 759
  • [42] External Validation of the Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Multicenter Internal Medicine Inpatients
    Chen, Xiaolan
    Shi, Hongning
    Chang, Jiaqi
    Guo, Wenjia
    Yang, Yuanhua
    Wang, Yong
    Pan, Lei
    CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS, 2024, 30
  • [43] Incidence and Risk Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
    Pan, James
    Bonow, Robert H.
    Temkin, Nancy
    Robinson, Ellen F.
    Sekhar, Laligam N.
    Levitt, Michael R.
    V. Lele, Abhijit
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 172 : E418 - E427
  • [44] Comparison between Caprini and Padua risk assessment models for hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: a retrospective study
    Liu, Xiaohan
    Liu, Chengyuan
    Chen, Xi
    Wu, Wenwen
    Lu, Gendi
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 23 (04) : 538 - 543
  • [45] Venous Thromboembolism (VIE): Risk Assessment in Hospitalized Patients
    Soomro, Quratulain
    Yousuf, Nailla
    Bhutto, Afsar Ali
    Abro, Hakim Ali
    Memon, Aijaz Ahmed
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2014, 24 (07): : 455 - 458
  • [46] Assessment of Venous Thromboembolism Risk in Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma
    Naim, Sara
    Douma, Soukaina
    Benmoussa, Amine
    Berrada, Sophia
    Lamchahab, Mouna
    Cherkaoui, Siham
    Qachouh, Meryem
    Rachid, Mohamed
    Madani, Abdellah
    Khoubila, Nisrine
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2024, 24 : S449 - S450
  • [47] A venous thromboembolism risk assessment model for patients with Cushing’s syndrome
    Marialuisa Zilio
    Linda Mazzai
    Maria Teresa Sartori
    Mattia Barbot
    Filippo Ceccato
    Viviana Daidone
    Alessandra Casonato
    Graziella Saggiorato
    Franco Noventa
    Laura Trementino
    Paolo Prandoni
    Marco Boscaro
    Giorgio Arnaldi
    Carla Scaroni
    Endocrine, 2016, 52 : 322 - 332
  • [48] Incidence, Risk Factors, and Modified Risk Assessment Model of Venous Thromboembolism in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients
    Li, Wen
    Liu, Rui
    Shen, Ying
    Gao, Gongzhizi
    Yang, Rui
    Wang, Yiwen
    Yang, Ruoyu
    Lin, Zujie
    Dong, Ruijun
    Zhao, Wanhong
    He, Aili
    Bai, Ju
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (24):
  • [49] A New Risk Prediction Model for Venous Thromboembolism and Death in Ambulatory Lung Cancer Patients
    Gomez-Rosas, Patricia
    Giaccherini, Cinzia
    Russo, Laura
    Verzeroli, Cristina
    Gamba, Sara
    Tartari, Carmen Julia
    Bolognini, Silvia
    Ticozzi, Chiara
    Schieppati, Francesca
    Barcella, Luca
    Sarmiento, Roberta
    Masci, Giovanna
    Tondini, Carlo
    Petrelli, Fausto
    Giuliani, Francesco
    D'Alessio, Andrea
    Minelli, Mauro
    De Braud, Filippo
    Santoro, Armando
    Labianca, Roberto
    Gasparini, Giampietro
    Marchetti, Marina
    Falanga, Anna
    HYPERCAN Investigators, H. Y. P. E. R. C. A. N. Investigators
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (18)
  • [50] Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in hospitalised adult patients: a systematic review
    Pandor, Abdullah
    Tonkins, Michael
    Goodacre, Steve
    Sworn, Katie
    Clowes, Mark
    Griffin, Xavier L.
    Holland, Mark
    Hunt, Beverley J.
    de Wit, Kerstin
    Horner, Daniel
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):