Diverticular per oral endoscopic myotomy (DPOEM) for esophageal diverticular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Mandavdhare, Harshal S. [1 ]
Praveen Kumar, M. [2 ]
Jha, Dayakrishna [1 ]
Kumar, Antriksh [1 ]
Sharma, Vishal [1 ]
Desai, Pankaj [3 ]
Shumkina, Lada [4 ]
Gupta, Pankaj [5 ]
Singh, Harjeet [6 ]
Dutta, Usha [1 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Gastroenterol, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Pharmacol, Chandigarh, India
[3] Surat Inst Digest Sci, Surat, India
[4] Moscow Clin Sci Ctr, Endoscopy Dept, Moscow, Russia
[5] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Radiodiag, Chandigarh, India
[6] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Surg, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Diverticulum; Esophagus; FESD; D-POEM; Success; SUBMUCOSAL TUNNELING TECHNIQUE; ZENKERS DIVERTICULUM; SEPTUM DIVISION; Z-POEM; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10388-021-00839-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The traditional way to tackle Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) has been flexible endoscopic septum division (FESD). Recently, the concept of per oral endoscopic myotomy has been found useful for managing diverticular diseases of the esophagus and has been termed DPOEM. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-POEM in diverticular disease of the esophagus and to compare it with FESD. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase, for studies reporting clinical success, technical success and adverse events in D-POEM alone or D-POEM comparing with FESD. We computed pooled prevalence for D-POEM alone and risk ratio for D-POEM vs FESD using random effect method with inverse variance approach. Subgroup analysis for ZD, non-ZD and mixed diverticulum was conducted. Totally 19 studies including 341 patients were identified reporting on D-POEM. The pooled clinical, technical success and adverse event rates for D-POEM were 87.07%, 95.19% and 10.22%, respectively. The clinical success was significantly better than FESD while the technical success, adverse event rate, procedure time and length of hospital stay were comparable with FESD. The recurrence rate was negligible for D-POEM compared to FESD. On subgroup analysis by dividing into three groups of ZD, non-ZD and mixed, there was no difference between clinical, technical success and adverse event rate among the three groups. D-POEM is an effective and safe technique among both ZD and non-ZD patients and has better clinical success than FESD.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 450
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Quality of Life Following Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhong, Chunyu
    Tan, Shali
    Ren, Yutang
    Lu, Muhan
    Peng, Yan
    Fu, Xiangsheng
    Tang, Xiaowei
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 26 (03) : 113 - 124
  • [12] Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy, Pneumatic Dilatation, and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia
    Aiolfi, Alberto
    Bona, Davide
    Riva, Carlo Galdino
    Micheletto, Giancarlo
    Rausa, Emanuele
    Campanelli, Giampiero
    Olmo, Giorgia
    Bonitta, Gianluca
    Bonavina, Luigi
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (02): : 147 - 155
  • [13] Comparative efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy and Heller myotomy in patients with achalasia: a meta-analysis
    Park, Chan Hyuk
    Jung, Da Hyun
    Kim, Do Hoon
    Lim, Chul-Hyun
    Moon, Hee Seok
    Park, Jung Ho
    Jung, Hye-Kyung
    Hong, Su Jin
    Choi, Suck Chei
    Lee, Oh Young
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 90 (04) : 546 - +
  • [14] Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is a Safe and Feasible Option in Management of Esophageal Diverticula: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Faisal Kamal
    Muhammad Ali Khan
    Wade Lee-Smith
    Sachit Sharma
    Hemnishil K. Marella
    Umair Iqbal
    Stephanie Mcdonough
    Aysha Aslam
    Mohammad K. Ismail
    Claudio Tombazzi
    Douglas G. Adler
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2021, 66 : 3242 - 3249
  • [15] Peroral endoscopic longer vs shorter esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Weng, Chun-Yan
    He, Cheng-Hai
    Zhuang, Ming-Yang
    Xu, Jing-Li
    Lyu, Bin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 14 (03):
  • [16] Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhong, Chunyu
    Tan, Shali
    Huang, Shu
    Lue, Muhan
    Peng, Yan
    Fu, Xiangsheng
    Tang, Xiaowei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (11) : 1413 - 1421
  • [17] The role of peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Han
    Huang, Shu
    Xia, Huifang
    Shi, Lei
    Zeng, Xinyi
    Jiang, Jiao
    Ren, Wensen
    Peng, Yan
    Lu, Muhan
    Tang, Xiaowei
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (05): : 2749 - 2759
  • [18] Achalasia: laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication versus peroral endoscopic myotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sobral, Joana
    Machado, Miguel
    Barbosa, Jose Pedro
    Barbosa, Jose
    ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 21 (03) : 298 - 305
  • [19] Peroral endoscopic myotomy for patients with achalasia with previous Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Zhenzi
    Cui, Yi
    Li, Yuanqi
    Chen, Minhu
    Xing, Xiangbin
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (01) : 47 - +
  • [20] Long-term Outcome of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Esophageal Motility Disorders A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nabi, Zaheer
    Mandavdhare, Harshal
    Akbar, Wahid
    Talukdar, Rupjyoti
    Reddy, Duvvur Nageshwar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 57 (03) : 227 - 238