Diverticular per oral endoscopic myotomy (DPOEM) for esophageal diverticular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:12
作者
Mandavdhare, Harshal S. [1 ]
Praveen Kumar, M. [2 ]
Jha, Dayakrishna [1 ]
Kumar, Antriksh [1 ]
Sharma, Vishal [1 ]
Desai, Pankaj [3 ]
Shumkina, Lada [4 ]
Gupta, Pankaj [5 ]
Singh, Harjeet [6 ]
Dutta, Usha [1 ]
机构
[1] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Gastroenterol, Chandigarh 160012, India
[2] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Pharmacol, Chandigarh, India
[3] Surat Inst Digest Sci, Surat, India
[4] Moscow Clin Sci Ctr, Endoscopy Dept, Moscow, Russia
[5] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Radiodiag, Chandigarh, India
[6] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Surg, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Diverticulum; Esophagus; FESD; D-POEM; Success; SUBMUCOSAL TUNNELING TECHNIQUE; ZENKERS DIVERTICULUM; SEPTUM DIVISION; Z-POEM; MANAGEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10388-021-00839-9
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The traditional way to tackle Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) has been flexible endoscopic septum division (FESD). Recently, the concept of per oral endoscopic myotomy has been found useful for managing diverticular diseases of the esophagus and has been termed DPOEM. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of D-POEM in diverticular disease of the esophagus and to compare it with FESD. We systematically searched PubMed and Embase, for studies reporting clinical success, technical success and adverse events in D-POEM alone or D-POEM comparing with FESD. We computed pooled prevalence for D-POEM alone and risk ratio for D-POEM vs FESD using random effect method with inverse variance approach. Subgroup analysis for ZD, non-ZD and mixed diverticulum was conducted. Totally 19 studies including 341 patients were identified reporting on D-POEM. The pooled clinical, technical success and adverse event rates for D-POEM were 87.07%, 95.19% and 10.22%, respectively. The clinical success was significantly better than FESD while the technical success, adverse event rate, procedure time and length of hospital stay were comparable with FESD. The recurrence rate was negligible for D-POEM compared to FESD. On subgroup analysis by dividing into three groups of ZD, non-ZD and mixed, there was no difference between clinical, technical success and adverse event rate among the three groups. D-POEM is an effective and safe technique among both ZD and non-ZD patients and has better clinical success than FESD.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 450
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   Current status of endoscopic treatment for esophageal diverticulum based on diverticular peroral endoscopic myotomy [J].
Sun, Guo-Yao ;
Sun, Yong ;
Wang, Xue-Zhu ;
Jia, Wen ;
Liu, Jiao ;
Yang, Zhuo ;
Gu, Jiang-Ning .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2025, 17 (06)
[12]   Gastric per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Li, Peiwen ;
Ma, Bin ;
Gong, Shulei ;
Zhang, Xinyu ;
Li, Wenya .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (05) :1108-1116
[13]   Quality of Life Following Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Zhong, Chunyu ;
Tan, Shali ;
Ren, Yutang ;
Lu, Muhan ;
Peng, Yan ;
Fu, Xiangsheng ;
Tang, Xiaowei .
ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 26 (03) :113-124
[14]   Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy, Pneumatic Dilatation, and Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Esophageal Achalasia [J].
Aiolfi, Alberto ;
Bona, Davide ;
Riva, Carlo Galdino ;
Micheletto, Giancarlo ;
Rausa, Emanuele ;
Campanelli, Giampiero ;
Olmo, Giorgia ;
Bonitta, Gianluca ;
Bonavina, Luigi .
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2020, 30 (02) :147-155
[15]   Comparative efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy and Heller myotomy in patients with achalasia: a meta-analysis [J].
Park, Chan Hyuk ;
Jung, Da Hyun ;
Kim, Do Hoon ;
Lim, Chul-Hyun ;
Moon, Hee Seok ;
Park, Jung Ho ;
Jung, Hye-Kyung ;
Hong, Su Jin ;
Choi, Suck Chei ;
Lee, Oh Young .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 90 (04) :546-+
[16]   Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is a Safe and Feasible Option in Management of Esophageal Diverticula: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Faisal Kamal ;
Muhammad Ali Khan ;
Wade Lee-Smith ;
Sachit Sharma ;
Hemnishil K. Marella ;
Umair Iqbal ;
Stephanie Mcdonough ;
Aysha Aslam ;
Mohammad K. Ismail ;
Claudio Tombazzi ;
Douglas G. Adler .
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2021, 66 :3242-3249
[17]   Peroral endoscopic longer vs shorter esophageal myotomy for achalasia treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Weng, Chun-Yan ;
He, Cheng-Hai ;
Zhuang, Ming-Yang ;
Xu, Jing-Li ;
Lyu, Bin .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 14 (03)
[18]   Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhong, Chunyu ;
Tan, Shali ;
Huang, Shu ;
Lue, Muhan ;
Peng, Yan ;
Fu, Xiangsheng ;
Tang, Xiaowei .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 32 (11) :1413-1421
[19]   The role of peroral endoscopic myotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Zhang, Han ;
Huang, Shu ;
Xia, Huifang ;
Shi, Lei ;
Zeng, Xinyi ;
Jiang, Jiao ;
Ren, Wensen ;
Peng, Yan ;
Lu, Muhan ;
Tang, Xiaowei .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (05) :2749-2759
[20]   Achalasia: laparoscopic Heller myotomy with fundoplication versus peroral endoscopic myotomy-a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Sobral, Joana ;
Machado, Miguel ;
Barbosa, Jose Pedro ;
Barbosa, Jose .
ESOPHAGUS, 2024, 21 (03) :298-305