Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb subcategorization preferences

被引:79
作者
Hare, M [1 ]
McRae, K
Elman, JL
机构
[1] Bowling Green State Univ, Dept Psychol, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
[2] Univ Western Ontario, London, England
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00516-8
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Readers are sensitive to the fact that verbs may allow multiple subcategorization frames that differ in their probability of occurrence. Although a verb's overall subcategorization preferences can be described probabilistically, underlying non-random factors may determine those probabilities. One potential factor is verb semantics: Many verbs show sense differences, and a verb's subcategorization profile can vary by sense. Thus, although find can occur with a direct object (DO) or a sentential complement (SC), when it is used to mean 'locate' it occurs only with a DO, whereas in its 'realize' sense it is SC-biased, but can take either frame. We used corpus analyses to identify verbs that occur with both frames, and found that their subcategorization probabilities differ by sense. Off-line sentence completions demonstrated that contexts can promote a specific sense of a verb, which subsequently influenced subcategorization probability. Finally, in a self-paced reading time experiment, verbs occurred in target sentences containing either a structurally unambiguous or ambiguous SC, following a context favoring the verb's DO- or SC-biased sense. Sense-biasing context influenced reading times at that, and interacted with ambiguity in the disambiguating region. Thus, readers use sense-contingent subcategorization preferences during on-line language comprehension. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 303
页数:23
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Ambiguity in sentence processing
    Altmann, GTM
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1998, 2 (04) : 146 - 152
  • [2] Thematic role assignment in context
    Altmann, GTM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 41 (01) : 124 - 145
  • [3] Argaman V., 2002, LEXICAL BASIS SENTEN, P303
  • [4] Bever Thomas G., 1970, COGNITIVE BASIS LING
  • [5] The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension
    Boland, JE
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1997, 12 (04): : 423 - 484
  • [6] CARAMAZZA A, 1976, GEORGETOWN U ROUNDTA, P181
  • [7] Clark H.H., 1977, PSYCHOL LANGUAGE
  • [8] PSYSCOPE - AN INTERACTIVE GRAPHIC SYSTEM FOR DESIGNING AND CONTROLLING EXPERIMENTS IN THE PSYCHOLOGY LABORATORY USING MACINTOSH COMPUTERS
    COHEN, J
    MACWHINNEY, B
    FLATT, M
    PROVOST, J
    [J]. BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS INSTRUMENTS & COMPUTERS, 1993, 25 (02): : 257 - 271
  • [9] VERB FRAME PREFERENCES - DESCRIPTIVE NORMS
    CONNINE, C
    FERREIRA, F
    JONES, C
    CLIFTON, C
    FRAZIER, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1984, 13 (04) : 307 - 319
  • [10] ELMAN J, 1995, MIND MOTION