Psychological, social, and situational factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination intentions: A study of UK key workers and non-key workers

被引:52
作者
Butter, Sarah [1 ]
McGlinchey, Emily [1 ]
Berry, Emma [2 ]
Armour, Cherie [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Psychol, Stress Trauma & Related Condit STARC Res Lab, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Ctr Improving Hlth Related Qual Life CIHRQoL, Sch Psychol, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
coronavirus; COVID-19; health behaviours; hesitancy; perceived risk; symptom severity; vaccine; HESITANCY; BEHAVIOR; VACCINES;
D O I
10.1111/bjhp.12530
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives Vaccine hesitancy is a growing concern and threat to public health. This research will begin to examine the relative influence of relevant psychological, social, and situational factors on intent to engage with a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine among key workers and non-key workers. Design Cross-sectional. Methods The study utilized a sample of UK adults who completed the 1-month follow-up of The COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study during April/May 2020 and indicated having not been previously diagnosed with COVID-19 (key workers n = 584; not key workers n = 1,021). These groups were compared in relation to their intentions to vaccinate, perceived risk of infection, and symptom severity. Binary logistic regression was used to examine predictors of vaccine hesitancy. Results Overall, 74.2% of the sample (76.2% key workers, 73.1% non-key workers) indicated they would accept a COVID-19 vaccine in future. Key workers (in particular health and social care workers) had a higher perceived risk of becoming infected in the coming months. For key workers, being female and perceiving oneself as having relatively low infection risk in the next 6 months was associated with increased likelihood of vaccine hesitancy. For non-key workers, however, being aged 25-54, having a low or average income and not knowing someone diagnosed with COVID-19 were associated with hesitancy. Conclusions The proportion of individuals willing to accept a vaccine is encouraging but there is much room for improvement. Given the unique predictors of vaccine hesitancy in each group, public health campaigns may benefit from targeted messaging.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 29
页数:17
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [11] Center for Systems Science and Engineering JHU, 2020, COVID 19 DASHB
  • [12] Correlation Between N95 Extended Use and Reuse and Fit Failure in an Emergency Department
    Degesys, Nida F.
    Wang, Ralph C.
    Kwan, Elizabeth
    Fahimi, Jahan
    Noble, Jeanne A.
    Raven, Maria C.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 324 (01): : 94 - 96
  • [13] Vaccine hesitancy An overview
    Dube, Eve
    Laberge, Caroline
    Guay, Maryse
    Bramadat, Paul
    Roy, Real
    Bettinger, Julie
    [J]. HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2013, 9 (08) : 1763 - 1773
  • [14] Commentary on Ferguson, et al., "Impact of Non-pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs) to Reduce COVID-19 Mortality and Healthcare Demand"
    Eubank, S.
    Eckstrand, I
    Lewis, B.
    Venkatramanan, S.
    Marathe, M.
    Barrett, C. L.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2020, 82 (04)
  • [15] Public Perceptions of COVID-19 in Australia: Perceived Risk, Knowledge, Health-Protective Behaviors, and Vaccine Intentions
    Faasse, Kate
    Newby, Jill M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [16] Overcoming COVID-19: Addressing the perception of risk and transitioning protective behaviors to habits
    Fakih, Mohamad G.
    Sturm, Lisa K.
    Fakih, Rand R.
    [J]. INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 42 (04) : 489 - 490
  • [17] Fu C., 2020, MEDRXIV, V4, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1101/2020.04.09.20060103, 10.1101/2020.04.09.20060103]
  • [18] Taking account of asymptomatic infections: A modeling study of the COVID-19 outbreak on the Diamond Princess cruise ship
    Huang, Li-Shan
    Li, Li
    Dunn, Lucia
    He, Mai
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [19] COVID-19: in the footsteps of Ernest Shackleton
    Ing, Alvin J.
    Cocks, Christine
    Green, Jeffery Peter
    [J]. THORAX, 2020, 75 (08) : 693 - 694
  • [20] IRNA, 2020, Statistical Bulletin