The use of complementary and integrative therapies as adjunct interventions during radiotherapy: a systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Lapen, Kaitlyn [1 ]
Cha, Elaine [1 ]
Huang, Christina C. [2 ]
Rosenberg, David M. [1 ]
Rooney, Michael K. [3 ]
McArthur, Mark [1 ]
Arya, Ritu [4 ]
Son, Christina H. [4 ]
McCall, Anne R. [4 ]
Golden, Daniel W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiat & Cellular Oncol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Complementary therapies; Radiotherapy; Therapeutic radiation; Systematic review; Patient support; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; CANCER-PATIENTS; BREAST-CANCER; RADIATION-THERAPY; PROSTATE-CANCER; CLINICAL-TRIALS; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-021-06173-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Literature supporting the efficacy of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) alongside radiotherapy is fragmented with varying outcomes and levels of evidence. This review summarizes the available evidence on CIM used with radiotherapy in order to inform clinicians. Methods A systematic literature review identified studies on the use of CIM during radiotherapy. Inclusion required the following criteria: the study was interventional, CIM therapy was for human patients with cancer, and CIM therapy was administered concurrently with radiotherapy. Data points of interest were collected from included studies. A subset was identified as high-quality using the Jadad scale. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the association between study results, outcome measured, and type of CIM. Results Overall, 163 articles met inclusion. Of these, 68 (41.7%) were considered high-quality trials. Articles published per year increased over time (p < 0.01). Frequently identified therapies were biologically based therapies (47.9%), mind-body therapies (23.3%), and alternative medical systems (13.5%). Within the subset of high-quality trials, 60.0% of studies reported a favorable change with CIM while 40.0% reported no change. No studies reported an unfavorable change. Commonly assessed outcome types were patient-reported (41.1%) and provider-reported (21.5%). Rate of favorable change did not differ based on type of CIM (p = 0.90) or outcome measured (p = 0.24). Conclusions Concurrent CIM may reduce radiotherapy-induced toxicities and improve quality of life, suggesting that physicians should discuss CIM with patients receiving radiotherapy. This review provides a broad overview of investigations on CIM use during radiotherapy and can inform how radiation oncologists advise their patients about CIM.
引用
收藏
页码:6201 / 6209
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of complementary and integrative therapies as adjunct interventions during radiotherapy: a systematic review
    Kaitlyn Lapen
    Elaine Cha
    Christina C. Huang
    David M. Rosenberg
    Michael K. Rooney
    Mark McArthur
    Ritu Arya
    Christina H. Son
    Anne R. McCall
    Daniel W. Golden
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 6201 - 6209
  • [2] Interventions for preparing patients for chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a systematic review
    Waller, Amy
    Forshaw, Kristy
    Bryant, Jamie
    Mair, Shannon
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (08) : 2297 - 2308
  • [3] Are complementary therapies and integrative care cost-effective? A systematic review of economic evaluations
    Herman, Patricia M.
    Poindexter, Beth L.
    Witt, Claudia M.
    Eisenberg, David M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (05):
  • [4] Radiation induced skin reactions during and following radiotherapy: A systematic review of interventions
    Burke, G.
    Faithfull, S.
    Probst, H.
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2022, 28 (01) : 232 - 239
  • [5] How Many Cancer Patients Use Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis
    Horneber, Markus
    Bueschel, Gerd
    Dennert, Gabriele
    Less, Danuta
    Ritter, Erik
    Zwahlen, Marcel
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2012, 11 (03) : 187 - 203
  • [6] Integrative and complementary practices to control nausea and vomiting in pregnant women: a systematic review
    Nassif, Melissa Santos
    Pinto Costa, Isabelle Cristinne
    Ribeiro, Patricia Monica
    Moura, Caroline de Castro
    de Oliveira, Paloma Elisama
    REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2022, 56
  • [7] Complementary and alternative medicine use in cancer: A systematic review
    Keene, Martin R.
    Heslop, Ian M.
    Sabesan, Sabe S.
    Glass, Beverley D.
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 35 : 33 - 47
  • [8] Do complementary and integrative medicine therapies reduce healthcare utilization among oncology patients? A systematic review of the literature and recommendations
    Tillery, Rachel
    McGrady, Meghan E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2018, 36 : 1 - 8
  • [9] Lifestyle and complementary therapies in multiple sclerosis guidelines: Systematic review
    Weld-Blundell, Isabelle V.
    Grech, Lisa
    Learmonth, Yvonne C.
    Marck, Claudia H.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2022, 145 (04): : 379 - 392
  • [10] Complementary/Integrative Therapies That Work: A Review of the Evidence
    Kligler, Benjamin
    Teets, Raymond
    Quick, Melissa
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2016, 94 (05) : 369 - 374