Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy with and without neoadjuvant gemcitabine for locally advanced unresectable or resected pancreatic cancer: A Phase I-II study

被引:46
作者
Brade, Anthony
Brierley, James
Oza, Amit
Gallinger, Steven
Cummings, Bernard
MacLean, Martha
Pond, Gregory R.
Hedley, David
Wong, Shun
Townsley, Carol
Brezden-Masley, Christine
Moore, Malcolm
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Radiat Oncol, Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med Oncol, Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Surg Oncol, Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[4] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Biostat, Princess Margaret Hosp, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada
[5] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Fac Med, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 67卷 / 04期
关键词
pancreatic cancer; gemcitabine; radiotherapy; Phase I-II study;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of biweekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) for resected and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic cancer. Methods and Materials: Eligible patients had either LA or resected pancreatic cancer. Between March 1999 and July 2001, 63 patients (31 with LA and 32 with resected disease) were treated. Of the 63 patients, 28 were enrolled in a Phase I study of increasing radiation doses (35 Gy [n = 7], 43.75 Gy [n = 11], and 52.5 Gy [n = 10] given within 4, 5, or 6 weeks, respectively, in 1.75-Gy fractions) concurrently with 40 mg/m(2) gemcitabine biweekly. Subsequently, 35 were enrolled in a Phase II study with the addition of induction gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) within 7 or 8 weeks to concurrent biweekly gemicitabine (40 mg/m(2)) and 52.5 Gy RT within 6 weeks. Results: In the LA population, the best response observed was a complete response in 1, partial response in 3, stable disease in 10, and progressive disease in 17. In the phase II trial, gemcitabine plus RT was not delivered to 8 patients because of progression with induction gemcitabine alone (n = 5) or by patient request (n = 3). On intent-to-treat analysis, the median survival in the LA patients was 13.9 months and the 2-year survival rate was 16.1%. In the resected population, the median progression-free survival was 8.3 months, the median survival was 18.4 months, and the 2- and 5-year survival rate was 36% and 19.4%, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated; the median gemcitabine dose intensity was 96% of the planned dose in the neoadjuvant and concurrent portions of the Phase II study. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: Biweekly gemcitabine (40 mg/m(2)) Concurrently with RT (52.5 Gy in 30 fractions of 1.75 Gy) with or without induction gemcitabine is safe and tolerable and shows efficacy in patients with LA and resected pancreatic cancer. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1036
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: Phase I trial of radiation dose escalation with concurrent full-dose gemcitabine
    Allen, AM
    Zalupski, MM
    Robertson, JM
    Eckhauser, FE
    Simone, D
    Brown, D
    Hejna, G
    Normolle, D
    Lawrence, TS
    McGinn, CJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (05): : 1461 - 1467
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1985, Cancer, V56, P2563
  • [3] Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297
    Berlin, JD
    Catalano, P
    Thomas, JP
    Kugler, JW
    Haller, DG
    Benson, AB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (15) : 3270 - 3275
  • [4] Blackstock A William, 2003, Int J Gastrointest Cancer, V34, P107
  • [5] Gemcitabine: In vitro and in vivo evidence of its radiation sensitizing activity and studies using fluorine-19 magnetic resonance spectroscopy to determine an optimal Gemcitabine dosing schedule - Pre-clinical observations relevant to Gemcitabine clinical trials.
    Blackstock, AW
    Kwock, L
    Hess, SM
    Leadon, SA
    Tepper, JE
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1997, 39 (02): : 205 - 205
  • [6] Phase I trial of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer
    Blackstock, AW
    Bernard, SA
    Richards, F
    Eagle, KS
    Case, LD
    Poole, ME
    Savage, PD
    Tepper, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (07) : 2208 - 2212
  • [7] BRIERLEY J, 1999, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V18, P713
  • [8] Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial
    Burris, HA
    Moore, MJ
    Andersen, J
    Green, MR
    Rothenberg, ML
    Madiano, MR
    Cripps, MC
    Portenoy, RK
    Storniolo, AM
    Tarassoff, P
    Nelson, R
    Dorr, FA
    Stephens, CD
    VanHoff, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) : 2403 - 2413
  • [9] Is the therapeutic index better with gemcitabine-based chemoradiation than with 5-fluorouracil-based chemoradiation in locally advanced pancreatic cancer?
    Crane, CH
    Abbruzzese, JL
    Evans, DB
    Wolff, RA
    Ballo, MT
    Delclos, M
    Milas, L
    Mason, K
    Charnsangavej, C
    Pisters, PWT
    Lee, JE
    Lenzi, R
    Vauthey, JN
    Wong, ABS
    Phan, T
    Nguyen, Q
    Janjan, NA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (05): : 1293 - 1302
  • [10] Gemcitabine-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    de Lange, SM
    van Groeningen, CJ
    Meijer, OWM
    Cuesta, MA
    Langendijk, JA
    van Riel, JMGH
    Pinedo, HM
    Peters, GJ
    Meijer, S
    Slotman, BJ
    Giaccone, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 (09) : 1212 - 1217