The impact and causal directions for the associations between diagnosis of ADHD, socioeconomic status, and intelligence by use of a bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization design

被引:20
|
作者
Michaelsson, Madeleine [1 ]
Yuan, Shuai [2 ]
Melhus, Hakan [3 ]
Baron, John A. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Byberg, Liisa [6 ]
Larsson, Susanna C. [2 ,6 ]
Michaelsson, Karl [6 ]
机构
[1] Dalarna Univ, Dept Educ, Falun, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Unit Cardiovasc & Nutr Epidemiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Uppsala Univ, Dept Med Sci, Clin Pharmacol, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[6] Uppsala Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Unit Med Epidemiol, Uppsala, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Attention-deficit; hyperactivity disorder; ADHD; Socioeconomic status; Education; Intelligence; Income; Townsend deprivation index; Mendelian randomization; Gene; GWAS; DEFICIT HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; GENETIC-VARIANTS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1186/s12916-022-02314-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Previous studies have reported associations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and lower socioeconomic status and intelligence. We aimed to evaluate the causal directions and strengths for these associations by use of a bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) design. Methods We used summary-level data from the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify genetic instruments for ADHD, intelligence, and markers of socioeconomic status including the Townsend deprivation index, household income, and educational attainment. Effect estimates from individual genetic variants were combined using inverse-variance weighted regression. Results A genetically predicted one standard deviation (SD) increment in the Townsend deprivation index conferred an odds ratio (OR) of 5.29 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89-14.76) for an ADHD diagnosis (p<0.001). A genetically predicted one SD higher education level conferred an OR of 0.30 (95% CI 0.25-0.37) (p<0.001), and a genetically predicted one SD higher family income provided an OR of 0.35 (95% CI 0.25-0.49; p<0.001). The associations remained after adjustment for intelligence whereas the lower odds of an ADHD diagnosis with higher intelligence did not persist after adjustment for liability to greater educational attainment (adjusted OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.68-1.56; p=0.87). The MR analysis of the effect of ADHD on socioeconomic markers found that genetic liability to ADHD was statistically associated with each of them (p<0.001) but not intelligence. However, the average change in the socioeconomic markers per doubling of the prevalence of ADHD corresponded only to 0.05-0.06 SD changes. Conclusions Our results indicate that an ADHD diagnosis may be a direct and strong intelligence-independent consequence of socioeconomic related factors, whereas ADHD appears to lead only to modestly lowered socioeconomic status. Low intelligence seems not to be a major independent cause or consequence of ADHD.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact and causal directions for the associations between diagnosis of ADHD, socioeconomic status, and intelligence by use of a bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization design
    Madeleine Michaëlsson
    Shuai Yuan
    Håkan Melhus
    John A. Baron
    Liisa Byberg
    Susanna C. Larsson
    Karl Michaëlsson
    BMC Medicine, 20
  • [2] Causal associations between socioeconomic status and prostate cancer using two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    Wang, Zhenxing
    Wang, Chunyan
    Gou, Xing
    Pei, Liang
    Qiao, Xiaoyuan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [3] Causal associations between epigenetic age and thromboembolism: a bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    Jin, Bowen
    Li, Yunyan
    Li, Dingyang
    Jing, Chi
    Sheng, Qunshan
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [4] Causal relationship between hyperthyroidism and cataracts: a two-sample bi-directional mendelian randomization study
    Ding, Helin
    Chen, Taige
    Peng, Hao
    Wang, Lu
    Gu, Jun
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [5] Causal relationship between genetically predicted depression and cancer risk: a two-sample bi-directional mendelian randomization
    Guang-Li Zhu
    Cheng Xu
    Kai-bin Yang
    Si-Qi Tang
    Ling-Long Tang
    Lei Chen
    Wen-Fei Li
    Yan-Ping Mao
    Jun Ma
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [6] Causal relationship between genetically predicted depression and cancer risk: a two-sample bi-directional mendelian randomization
    Zhu, Guang-Li
    Xu, Cheng
    Yang, Kai-Bin
    Tang, Si-Qi
    Tang, Ling-Long
    Chen, Lei
    Li, Wen-Fei
    Mao, Yan-Ping
    Ma, Jun
    BMC CANCER, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [7] Causal relationship between inflammatory proteins and glioblastoma: a two-sample bi-directional mendelian randomization study
    Lin, Xiang
    Gao, Wei
    Huang, Chen
    Wu, Minghua
    She, Xiaoling
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2024, 15
  • [8] Associations between gut microbiota and gynecological cancers: A bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    Kong, Youqian
    Liu, Shaoxuan
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Qie, Rui
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (13) : E37628
  • [9] The causal relationship between gut microbiota and diabetic neuropathy: a bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization study
    Xie, Long
    Gan, Wen
    Cai, Guangrong
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [10] Bi-directional two-sample Mendelian randomization identifies causal association of depression with temporomandibular disorders
    Que, Hanxin
    Zhang, Qinglian
    Xu, Shengming
    Chu, Tengda
    Xu, Leyan
    Wang, Yi
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 51 (09) : 1653 - 1661