Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation between nasopharyngeal carcinoma and lymphoma at the primary site

被引:15
作者
Yu, Xiao-ping [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hou, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Fei-ping [1 ,2 ]
Xiang, Wang [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Qiang [1 ,2 ]
Hu, Yin [2 ,4 ]
Wang, Hui [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Hunan Canc Hosp, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent S Univ, Xiangya Sch Med, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Cent S Univ, Xiangya Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[4] Cent S Univ, Hunan Canc Hosp, Dept Diagnost Radiotherapy, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
nasopharyngeal carcinoma; nasopharyngeal lymphoma; dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; diffusion-weighted imaging; sensitivity and specificity; HEAD; PARAMETERS; TUMORS; COEFFICIENTS; OROPHARYNX; LESIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr.20150317
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the value of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (QDCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) in differentiating nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) from lymphoma. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the data from 102 patients (82 with NPC and 20 with lymphoma) who underwent pre-treatment QDCE-MRI and DW-MRI on a 1.5-T MR unit. QDEC-MRI parameters [influx transfer constant (K-trans), efflux rate constant (K-ep), fractional volume of extravascular extracellular space (V-e) and fractional volume of plasma (f(PV))] based on pharmacokinetic model and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were compared between the two nasopharyngeal malignancies. Results: The K-trans, K-ep, V-e, f(PV) and ADC values (mean +/- standard deviation) for NPC were 0.366 +/- 0.155 min(-1), 1.353 +/- 0.468 min(-1), 0.292 +/- 0.117, 0.027 +/- 0.024 and 0.981 +/- 0.1843 x 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1), respectively. The K-trans, K-ep, V-e, f(PV) and ADC values (mean +/- standard deviation) for lymphoma were 0.212 +/- 0.059 min(-1), 1.073 +/- 0.238 min(-1), 0.213 +/- 0.104, 0.008 +/- 0.007 and 0.760 +/- 0.182 x 10(-3) mm(2) s(-1), respectively. Optimal cut-off values (area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity) for distinguishing the two tumours were as follows: K-trans=0.262min(-1) (0.866, 80.49%, 85.00%), K-ep=1.401 min(-1) (0.681, 43.90%, 100.00%), V-e=0.211 (0.784, 76.83%, 85.00%), f(PV)=5 0.012 (0.779, 60.98%, 85.00%), ADC=0.761x10(-3)mm(2)s(-1) (0.781, 93.90%, 55.00%). Conclusions: QDCE-MRI together with DW-MRI is useful for differentiation between NPC and lymphoma.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM [J].
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (06) :1471-1474
[2]   Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, head and neck lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma at the primary site [J].
Fong, Devin ;
Bhatia, Kunwar S. S. ;
Yeung, David ;
King, Ann D. .
ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 46 (08) :603-606
[3]   Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for characterising nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative parameters and correlation with tumour stage [J].
Huang, Bingsheng ;
Wong, Chun-Sing ;
Whitcher, Brandon ;
Kwong, Dora Lai-Wan ;
Lai, Vincent ;
Chan, Queenie ;
Khong, Pek-Lan .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (06) :1495-1502
[4]   Efficacy of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Differentiation between Lymphomas and Carcinomas of the Nasopharynx and Oropharynx: Correlations of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and Histologic Features [J].
Ichikawa, Y. ;
Sumi, M. ;
Sasaki, M. ;
Sumi, T. ;
Nakamura, T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (04) :761-766
[5]   Evaluation of imaging findings differentiating extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma from squamous cell carcinoma in naso- and oropharynx [J].
Kato, Hiroki ;
Kanematsu, Masayuki ;
Kawaguchi, Shimpei ;
Watanabe, Haruo ;
Mizuta, Keisuke ;
Aoki, Mitsuhiro .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2013, 37 (04) :657-663
[6]   Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for mouse models using automatic detection of the arterial input function [J].
Kim, Jae-Hun ;
Im, Geun Ho ;
Yang, Jehoon ;
Choi, Dongil ;
Lee, Won Jae ;
Lee, Jung Hee .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2012, 25 (04) :674-684
[7]   The Application of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Diffusion-Weighted MRI in Patients with Maxillofacial Tumors [J].
Kitamoto, Erina ;
Chikui, Toru ;
Kawano, Shintaro ;
Ohga, Masahiro ;
Kobayashi, Kouji ;
Matsuo, Yoshio ;
Yoshiura, Takashi ;
Obara, Makoto ;
Honda, Hiroshi ;
Yoshiura, Kazunori .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 22 (02) :210-216
[8]   Dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differential diagnosis in head and neck cancers [J].
Lee, Francis Kar-Ho ;
King, Ann Dorothy ;
Ma, Brigitte Buig-Yue ;
Yeung, David Ka-Wai .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 81 (04) :784-788
[9]   Assessment of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Differentiation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma From Other Pancreatic Solid Lesions [J].
Liu, Kefu ;
Xie, Ping ;
Peng, Weijun ;
Zhou, Zhengrong .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2014, 38 (05) :681-686
[10]   Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and dynamic MRI evaluation of extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma in oral and maxillofacial regions [J].
Matsuzaki, Hidenobu ;
Hara, Marina ;
Yanagi, Yoshinobu ;
Asaumi, Jun-ichi ;
Katase, Naoki ;
Unetsubo, Teruhisa ;
Hisatomi, Miki ;
Konouchi, Hironobu ;
Takenobu, Toshihiko ;
Nagatsuka, Hitoshi .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 113 (01) :126-133