Safety leading indicators in construction: A systematic review

被引:39
作者
Xu, Jing [1 ]
Cheung, Clara [2 ]
Manu, Patrick [2 ]
Ejohwomu, Obuks [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 6BT, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Construction safety; Proactive performance indicator; Safety leading indicators; Safety performance measurement; Systematic literature review; OCCUPATIONAL-HEALTH; ACCIDENT CAUSALITY; CLIMATE MODEL; PERFORMANCE; PROJECT; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; CULTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105250
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Safety leading indicators have been investigated as an emergent area in the construction industry. Yet the fundamental concepts of leading indicators, including definitions, viability and effectiveness, have not been commonly agreed. Despite this, various indicators have been proposed in construction management research. However, the findings are sporadic, and the relationships between proposed leading indicators and accident attributors remain unclear. This knowledge gap can hamper the implementation of safety leading indicators and proactive safety management in the construction industry. Based on a systematic literature review, the present study aims to: develop a common working definition of safety leading indicator for a better understanding of the current research in the construction sector; identify construction safety leading indicators; and create an integrated framework that fits in the complex and fragment structure of the construction industry for proactive safety management. The findings revealed sixteen indicators that were categorized into two dimensions to: 1) measure the safety performance of firms, projects or groups and individuals; and 2) identify potential incidents and injuries caused by organizational, operational or cognitive and behavioral issues. The findings call for researchers and practitioners to take an ecosystem perspective, consider the temporal effects, and combine qualitative and quantitative measurements in future research and implementing safety leading indicators in the construction industry.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 113 条
  • [101] Right-time vs real-time pro-active construction safety and health system architecture
    Teizer, Jochen
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION INNOVATION-ENGLAND, 2016, 16 (03): : 253 - 280
  • [102] Developing a model to measure the effectiveness of safety management systems of construction sites
    Teo, Evelyn Ai Lin
    Ling, Florence Yean Yng
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 41 (11) : 1584 - 1592
  • [103] The indirect effect of safety investment on safety performance for building projects
    Teo, Evelyn Ai-Lin
    Feng, Yingbin
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2011, 54 (01) : 65 - 80
  • [104] Toellner J., 2001, PROF SAF, V46, P42, DOI DOI 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.016
  • [105] The trajectories of prevention through design in construction
    Toole, T. Michael
    Gambatese, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (02) : 225 - 230
  • [106] Trethewy R., 2003, J OCCUP HLTH SAF AUS, V16, P527
  • [107] Utilizing construction safety leading and lagging indicators to measure project safety performance: A case study
    Versteeg, Katelyn
    Bigelow, Philip
    Dale, Ann Marie
    Chaurasia, Ashok
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 120 : 411 - 421
  • [108] Weick KE, 2015, MANAGING THE UNEXPECTED: SUSTAINED PERFORMANCE IN A COMPLEX WORLD, 3RD EDITION, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781119175834
  • [109] Causal factors and connections in construction accidents
    Winge, Stig
    Albrechtsen, Eirik
    Mostue, Bodil Aamnes
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 112 : 130 - 141
  • [110] Leading? Lagging? Whatever!
    Wreathall, John
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2009, 47 (04) : 493 - 494