Perspectives of Community Co-Researchers About Group Dynamics and Equitable Partnership Within a Community-Academic Research Team

被引:23
作者
Vaughn, Lisa M. [1 ]
Jacquez, Farrah [2 ]
Zhen-Duan, Jenny [2 ]
机构
[1] Cincinnati Childrens Hosp Med Ctr, Cincinnati, OH 45229 USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
co-researchers; community-academic partnership; community-academic research team; community-based participatory research; group dynamics; IMPROVE HEALTH EQUITY; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; COLLABORATIONS; INTERVENTIONS; IMMIGRANTS; PREVENTION; SCIENCE; PROJECT; CARE;
D O I
10.1177/1090198118769374
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Equitable partnership processes and group dynamics, including individual, relational, and structural factors, have been identified as key ingredients to successful community-based participatory research partnerships. The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate the key aspects of group dynamics and partnership from the perspectives of community members serving as co-researchers. Semistructured, in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 Latino immigrant co-researchers from an intervention project with Latinos Unidos por la Salud (LU-Salud), a community research team composed of Latino immigrant community members and academic investigators working in a health research partnership. A deductive framework approach guided the interview process and qualitative data analysis. The LU-Salud co-researchers described relationships, personal growth, beliefs/identity motivation (individual dynamics), coexistence (relational dynamics), diversity, and power/resource sharing (structural dynamics) as key foundational aspects of the community-academic partnership. Building on existing CBPR and team science frameworks, these findings demonstrate that group dynamics and partnership processes are fundamental drivers of individual-level motivation and meaning making, which ultimately sustain efforts of community partners to engage with the research team and also contribute to the achievement of intended research outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 689
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, DOING QUALITATIVE RE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, METHODS COMMUNITY BA
[3]  
Burns N., 2005, The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique, and utilization, V5th
[4]   Process evaluation for community participation [J].
Butterfoss, FD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 27 :323-340
[5]   Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: Factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning [J].
Butterfoss, FD ;
Goodman, RM ;
Wandersman, A .
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 1996, 23 (01) :65-79
[6]   From Collaborative Ethnography to Collaborative Pedagogy: Reflections on the Other Side of Middletown Project and Community-University Research Partnerships [J].
Campbell, Elizabeth ;
Lassiter, Luke Eric .
ANTHROPOLOGY & EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2010, 41 (04) :370-385
[7]   Defining Factors of Successful University-Community Collaborations: An Exploration of One Healthy Marriage Project [J].
Carlton, Erik L. ;
Whiting, Jason B. ;
Bradford, Kay ;
Dyk, Patricia Hyjer ;
Vail, Ann .
FAMILY RELATIONS, 2009, 58 (01) :28-40
[8]  
Cocker F., 2016, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V13, pE618, DOI [DOI 10.3390/IJERPH13060618, 10.3390/ijerph13060618]
[9]   Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research [J].
Gale, Nicola K. ;
Heath, Gemma ;
Cameron, Elaine ;
Rashid, Sabina ;
Redwood, Sabi .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013, 13
[10]   Governing through community allegiance: a qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research [J].
Guta, Adrian ;
Flicker, Sarah ;
Roche, Brenda .
CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2013, 23 (04) :432-451