Application of deep learning for power system state forecasting

被引:14
作者
Mukherjee, Debottam [1 ]
Chakraborty, Samrat [2 ]
Ghosh, Sandip [1 ]
Mishra, Rakesh Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol BHU, Dept Elect Engn, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol Arunachal Pradesh, Dept Elect Engn, Yupia 791112, Arunachal Prade, India
来源
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS | 2021年 / 31卷 / 09期
关键词
copula; deep learning; gaussian multivariate; smart grid; state estimation; state forecasting; ESTIMATOR;
D O I
10.1002/2050-7038.12901
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The recent trend in modern power sector is to maintain observability of the grid for its smooth operation under all circumstances. To ascertain this aforementioned criterion, grid operators employ state estimation algorithms with a priori measurement data to determine the current operating states of the grid. The prime ideology behind such algorithms is the presence of an over-determined class of system with abundant measurement redundancy. With loss of real time measurement data, operators resort to state forecasting-based solutions. This work focuses on the use of scalable deep learning and machine learning models for appropriate forecasting of operating states both for healthy and contingency scenarios. This work also incorporates a critical comparison between them based on RMSE, MSE, MAE and R-squared index. To facilitate a better training and to prevent model underfitting, Gaussian copula based synthetic data are incorporated showcasing substantial enhancement in performance indices of the models [GRU (0.7958 -> 0.0088), LSTM (1.1173 -> 0.1020), SVM (1.7256 -> 0.1654) and SNN (2.5381 -> 0.1972)]. Such training strategies even under system unobservability with optimal hyper-parameter tuning of the models can lead to proper forecasting of operating states of the system. A comparative analysis between the neural network models under varying noise scenarios also portrays the efficacy of the proposed GRU model. The proposed architecture can also be implemented for real time state forecasting scheme with computational time in the order of micro (mu) seconds (210.34 mu s). Simulation results on IEEE 14 bus system validate these aforementioned propositions.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   POWER SYSTEM STATIC-STATE ESTIMATION .1. EXACT MODEL [J].
SCHWEPPE, FC ;
WILDES, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS, 1970, PA89 (01) :120-&
[42]   Power System Tracking State Estimator for Smart Grid Under Unreliable PMU Data Communication Network [J].
Sharma, A. ;
Samantaray, S. R. .
IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (05) :2107-2116
[43]   A Cubature Kalman Filter Based Power System Dynamic State Estimator [J].
Sharma, A. ;
Srivastava, S. C. ;
Chakrabarti, S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2017, 66 (08) :2036-2045
[44]   Dynamic state estimator using ANN based bus load prediction [J].
Sinha, AK ;
Mondal, JK .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 1999, 14 (04) :1219-1225
[45]   Multi-area state estimation in a distribution network using Takagi-Sugeno model estimated by Kalman filter [J].
Talebi Ghadikolaee, Ebad ;
Kazemi, Ahad ;
Shayanfar, Heydar Ali .
INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2020, 30 (08)
[46]   Robust Forecasting-Aided State Estimation for Power System Against Uncertainties [J].
Wang, Yi ;
Sun, Yonghui ;
Dinavahi, Venkata .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2020, 35 (01) :691-702
[47]  
Ying Gao, 2010, Proceedings 2010 International Conference on Progress in Informatics and Computing (PIC 2010), P254, DOI 10.1109/PIC.2010.5687453
[48]   A Joint Filter Approach for Reliable Power System State Estimation [J].
Yu, Yang ;
Wang, Zhongjie ;
Lu, Chengchao .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2019, 68 (01) :87-94
[49]   Real-Time Power System State Estimation and Forecasting via Deep Unrolled Neural Networks [J].
Zhang, Liang ;
Wang, Gang ;
Giannakis, Georgios B. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 67 (15) :4069-4077
[50]  
Zhang L, 2018, IEEE GLOB CONF SIG, P907, DOI 10.1109/GlobalSIP.2018.8646629