Charlson comorbidity index is predictive of postoperative clinical outcome after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery

被引:36
作者
Shinonara, Kensuke [1 ]
Ugawa, Ryo [1 ]
Arataki, Shinya [1 ]
Nakahara, Shinnosuke [1 ]
Takeuchi, Kazuhiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org, Okayama Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Kita Ku, 1711-1 Tamasu, Okayama, Japan
关键词
Charlson comorbidity index; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion; Clinical outcome; Improvement rate; Complication; Length of stay; Direct cost;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-021-02377-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background In several previous studies, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score was associated with postoperative complications, mortality, and re-admission. There are few reports about the influence of CCI score on postoperative clinical outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of comorbidities as calculated with CCI on postoperative clinical outcomes after PLIF. Methods Three hundred sixty-six patients who underwent an elective primary single-level PLIF were included. Postoperative clinical outcome was evaluated with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association lumbar score (JOA score). The correlation coefficient between the CCI score and postoperative improvement in JOA score was investigated. Patients were divided into three groups according to their CCI score (0, 1, and 2+). JOA improvement rate, length of stay (LOS), and direct cost were compared between each group. Postoperative complications were also investigated. Results There was a weak negative relationship between CCI score and JOA improvement rate (r = - 0.20). LOS and direct cost had almost no correlation with CCI score. The JOA improvement rate of group 0 and group 1 was significantly higher than group 2+. LOS and direct cost were also significantly different between group 0 and group 2+. There were 14 postoperative complications. Adverse postoperative complications were equivalently distributed in each group, and not associated with the number of comorbidities. Conclusions A higher CCI score leads to a poor postoperative outcome. The recovery rate of patients with two or more comorbidities was significantly higher than in patients without comorbidities. However, the CCI score did not influence LOS and increased direct costs. The surgeon must take into consideration the patient's comorbidities when planning a surgical intervention in order to achieve a good clinical outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Charlson Score is a Robust Predictor of 30-Day Complications Following Spinal Metastasis Surgery
    Arrigo, Robert T.
    Kalanithi, Paul
    Cheng, Ivan
    Alamin, Todd
    Carragee, Eugene J.
    Mindea, Stefan A.
    Boakye, Maxwell
    Park, Jon
    [J]. SPINE, 2011, 36 (19) : E1274 - E1280
  • [2] Patient comorbidity score predicting the incidence of perioperative complications: assessing the impact of comorbidities on complications in spine surgery Clinical article
    Campbell, Peter G.
    Yadla, Sanjay
    Nasser, Rani
    Malone, Jennifer
    Maltenfort, Mitchell G.
    Ratliff, John K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 16 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [3] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [4] Postoperative Emergency Department Utilization and Hospital Readmission After Cervical Spine Arthrodesis Rates, Trends, Causes, and Risk Factors
    Derman, Peter B.
    Lampe, Lukas P.
    Pan, Ting Jung
    Salzmann, Stephan N.
    Kueper, Janina
    Girardi, Federico P.
    Lyman, Stephen
    Hughes, Alexander P.
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (15) : 1031 - 1037
  • [5] Mortality in Elderly Patients After Cervical Spine Fractures
    Harris, Mitchel B.
    Reichmann, William M.
    Bono, Christopher M.
    Bouchard, Kim
    Corbett, Kelly L.
    Warholic, Natalie
    Simon, Josef B.
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Maciolek, Lawrence
    Corsello, Paul
    Losina, Elena
    Katz, Jeffrey N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2010, 92A (03) : 567 - 574
  • [6] Cantilever Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Upper Lumbar Degenerative Diseases (Minimum 2 Years Follow Up)
    Hioki, Akira
    Miyamoto, Kei
    Hosoe, Hideo
    Sugiyama, Seiichi
    Suzuki, Naoki
    Shimizu, Katsuji
    [J]. YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 52 (02) : 314 - 321
  • [7] Huang Y, 2017, J BUON, V22, P686
  • [8] Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: An epidemiological perspective - The Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study
    Jacobsen, Steffen
    Sonne-Holm, Stig
    Rovsing, Hans
    Monrad, Henrik
    Gebuhr, Peter
    [J]. SPINE, 2007, 32 (01) : 120 - 125
  • [9] The Impact of Comorbidity Burden on Complications, Length of Stay, and Direct Hospital Costs After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Khechen, Benjamin
    Haws, Brittany E.
    Bawa, Mundeep S.
    Patel, Dil, V
    Cardinal, Kaitlyn L.
    Guntin, Jordan A.
    Lalehzarian, Simon P.
    Singh, Kern
    [J]. SPINE, 2019, 44 (05) : 363 - 368
  • [10] To fuse or not to fuse in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: do baseline symptoms help provide the answer?
    Kleinstueck, F. S.
    Fekete, T. F.
    Mannion, A. F.
    Grob, D.
    Porchet, F.
    Mutter, U.
    Jeszenszky, D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (02) : 268 - 275