How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process

被引:82
作者
Boese, Vanessa A. [1 ]
Edgell, Amanda B. [1 ,2 ]
Hellmeier, Sebastian [1 ,3 ]
Maerz, Seraphine F. [1 ]
Lindberg, Staffan, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, V Dem Inst, Dept Polit Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Polit Sci, Tuscaloosa, AL USA
[3] WZB Berlin Social Sci Ctr, Berlin, Germany
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Democratic resilience; democratic survival; democratic breakdown; autocratization; judicial constraints; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; CONSOLIDATION; COUPS; PARLIAMENTARISM; PRESIDENTIALISM; DIFFUSION; STABILITY; DURATION; LEGACIES; CRISIS;
D O I
10.1080/13510347.2021.1891413
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This article introduces a novel conceptualization of democratic resilience - a two-stage process where democracies avoid democratic declines altogether or avert democratic breakdown given that such autocratization is ongoing. Drawing on the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) dataset, we find that democracies have had a high level of resilience to onset of autocratization since 1900. Nevertheless, democratic resilience has become substantially weaker since the end of the Cold War. Fifty-nine episodes of sustained and substantial declines in democratic practices have occurred since 1993, leading to the unprecedented breakdown of 36 democratic regimes. Ominously, we find that once autocratization begins, only one in five democracies manage to avert breakdown. We also analyse which factors are associated with each stage of democratic resilience. The results suggest that democracies are more resilient when strong judicial constraints on the executive are present and democratic institutions were strong in the past. Conversely and adding nuance to the literature, economic development is only associated with resilience to onset of autocratization, not to resilience against breakdown once autocratization has begun.
引用
收藏
页码:885 / 907
页数:23
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [41] Jeffreys-prior penalty, finiteness and shrinkage in binomial-response generalized linear models
    Kosmidis, Ioannis
    Firth, David
    [J]. BIOMETRIKA, 2021, 108 (01) : 71 - 82
  • [42] Laebens Melis., 2019, BERL DEM C BERL NOV BERL DEM C BERL NOV
  • [43] Lindberg StaffanI., 2006, DEMOCRACY ELECTIONS
  • [44] Linz JuanJ., 1990, Journal of Democracy, V1, P51, DOI DOI 10.1353/jod.1990.0059
  • [46] A third wave of autocratization is here: what is new about it?
    Luhrmann, Anna
    Lindberg, Staffan I.
    [J]. DEMOCRATIZATION, 2019, 26 (07) : 1095 - 1113
  • [47] Regimes of the World (RoW): Opening New Avenues for the Comparative Study of Political Regimes
    Luhrmann, Anna
    Tannenberg, Marcus
    Lindberg, Staffan I.
    [J]. POLITICS AND GOVERNANCE, 2018, 6 (01): : 60 - 77
  • [48] Luhrmann Anna., 2020, EPISODES REGIME TRAN
  • [49] State of the world 2019: autocratization surges - resistance grows
    Maerz, Seraphine F.
    Luhrmann, Anna
    Hellmeier, Sebastian
    Grahn, Sandra
    Lindberg, Staffan I.
    [J]. DEMOCRATIZATION, 2020, 27 (06) : 909 - 927
  • [50] Maerz Seraphine F., 2020, ERT R PACKAGE LOAD E