Strain Elastography-Targeted Biopsy: Does Prostate Volume Affect Prostate Cancer Detaction?

被引:2
作者
Zhu, Yi-Cheng [1 ]
Shan, Jun [1 ]
Zhang, Yuan [1 ]
Jiang, Quan [1 ]
Wang, Yong-Bing [2 ]
Deng, Shu-Hao [1 ]
Qu, Qing-Hua [3 ]
Li, Qing [4 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Pudong New Area Peoples Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Pudong New Area Peoples Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Pudong New Area Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ Med & Hlth Sci, Pudong New Area Peoples Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2019年 / 25卷
关键词
Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Image-Guided Biopsy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Ultrasonography; REAL-TIME ELASTOGRAPHY; FUSION-GUIDED BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; STIFFNESS; IMPROVE;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.917344
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The present study aimed to assess the correlation between prostate volume and prostate cancer (PCa) detection by strain elastography (SE)-guided targeted biopsy (TB) compared with conventional transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy (SB). Material/Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 357 patients suspected to have PCa. All patients received TRUS-guided 10-core SB and SE-guided TB. The sensitivity for PCa detected by SE-guided TB was compared with that by TRUS-guided SB, in combination with prostate biopsy pathology. The correlation between the prostate volume and the detection rate of SE-guided TB was investigated. Results: PCa was pathologically confirmed in 151 out of 357 patients. The by-patient detection rate of TRUS-guided SB was 72.8% (110/151). Subsequently, a further increase of 6.6% (10/151) in PCa determination was obtained by the SE-guided TB. The sensitivity of SE-guided TB for patients with prostate volume <30 ml, 30-50 ml, 51-80 ml, and >80 ml was 91.7% (44/48), 80.3% (53/66), 70.4% (19/27), and 40.0% (4/10), respectively (p=0.002). For patients with a prostate volume less than 30 ml, SE-guided TB (91.7%) had a higher sensitivity than SB (62.5%) (p<0.007). Conclusions: SE-guided TB has a higher detection rate of PCa in comparison with TRUS-guided SB. There was also a negative correlation between prostate volume and SE-guided TB. Therefore, use of SE-guided TB may complement use of conventional SB, especially for patients with smaller prostate volume.
引用
收藏
页码:8836 / 8842
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer Harboring Adverse Pathological Features of Intraductal Carcinoma and Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma
    Prendeville, Susan
    Gertner, Mark
    Maganti, Manjula
    Pintilie, Melania
    Perlis, Nathan
    Toi, Ants
    Evans, Andrew J.
    Finelli, Antonio
    van der Kwast, Theodorus H.
    Ghai, Sangeet
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (01) : 104 - 112
  • [32] Prostate saturation biopsy in the reevaluation of microfocal prostate cancer
    Boccon-Gibod, L. M.
    de Longehamps, N. Barry
    Toublanc, M.
    Boccon-Gibod, L. A.
    Ravery, V.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (03) : 961 - 963
  • [33] Value of enhanced transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a retrospective data analysis
    Aigner, Friedrich
    Schaefer, Georg
    Steiner, Eberhard
    Jaschke, Werner
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Herrmann, Thomas R. W.
    Nagele, Udo
    Halpern, Ethan J.
    Frauscher, Ferdinand
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (03) : 341 - 346
  • [34] Value of enhanced transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a retrospective data analysis
    Friedrich Aigner
    Georg Schäfer
    Eberhard Steiner
    Werner Jaschke
    Wolfgang Horninger
    Thomas R. W. Herrmann
    Udo Nagele
    Ethan J. Halpern
    Ferdinand Frauscher
    World Journal of Urology, 2012, 30 : 341 - 346
  • [35] Characterizing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Template Prostate Mapping Biopsy
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    Hu, Yipeng
    Carter, Tim
    Arumainayagam, Nimalan
    Lecornet, Emilie
    Freeman, Alex
    Hawkes, David
    Barratt, Dean C.
    Emberton, Mark
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02) : 458 - 464
  • [36] The extent of lymphadenectomy for pTXNO prostate cancer does not affect prostate cancer outcome in the prostate specific antigen era
    DiMarco, DS
    Zincke, H
    Sebo, TJ
    Slezak, J
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Blute, ML
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04) : 1121 - 1125
  • [37] Targeted biopsy added to systematic biopsy improves cancer detection in prostate cancer screening
    Li, Peizi
    Ni, Pu
    Kombak, Faruk Erdem
    Wolters, Emily
    Haines, George Kenneth
    Si, Qiusheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2024, 17 (05): : 173 - 181
  • [38] Prostate Specific Antigen Velocity Does Not Aid Prostate Cancer Detection in Men With Prior Negative Biopsy
    Vickers, Andrew J.
    Wolters, Tineke
    Savage, Caroline J.
    Cronin, Angel M.
    O'Brien, M. Frank
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Aus, Gunnar
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Lilja, Hans
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (03) : 907 - 912
  • [39] The influence of prostate volume on prostate cancer detection using a combined approach of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography-targeted and systematic grey-scale biopsy
    Colleselli, Daniela
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Schaefer, Georg
    Frauscher, Ferdinand
    Mitterberger, Michael
    Brunner, Andrea
    Schwentner, Christian
    Bartsch, Georg
    Horninger, Wolfgang
    Pelzer, Alexandre E.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 100 (06) : 1264 - 1267
  • [40] Prostate Cancer Volume Estimation by Combining Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy Proven Cancer Core Length: Correlation with Cancer Volume
    Matsugasumi, Toru
    Baco, Eduard
    Palmer, Suzanne
    Aron, Manju
    Sato, Yoshinobu
    Fukuda, Norio
    Sueer, Evren
    Bernhard, Jean-Christophe
    Nakagawa, Hideo
    Azhar, Raed A.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Ukimura, Osamu
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (04) : 957 - 965