Effect of competition on gain in feedlot bulls from Hereford selection lines

被引:19
作者
Van Vleck, L. D. [1 ]
Cundiff, L. V.
Koch, R. M.
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Dept Anim Sci, Lincoln, NE 68583 USA
[2] Roman L Hruska US Meat Anim Res Ctr, Clay Ctr, NE 68933 USA
关键词
average daily gain; beef cattle; competition effect; genetic effect;
D O I
10.2527/jas.2007-0067
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study examined competition effects on ADG in the feedlot of 1,882 Hereford bulls representing 8 birth years from a selection experiment. Each year, 8 feedlot pens were used to feed bulls in groups, with 2 pens nested within each of the 4 selection lines. Gains were recorded for up to 8 periods of 28 d. Models for analyses included pen effects (fixed or random), fixed effects such as year and line, and random direct genetic, competition genetic (and in some analyses competition environmental), and environmental effects. Each pen mate as a competitor affected the records of all others in the pen. All lines traced to common foundation animals, so the numerator relationships among and within pens were the bases for separating direct and competition genetic effects and pen effects. For this population and pen conditions (average of 30 bulls per pen), the major results were 1) competition genetic effects seemed present for the first 28-d period but not for the following 7 periods; 2) models with pens considered as fixed effects could not separate variances and covariance due to direct and competition genetic effects; 3) models without competition effects had large estimates of the variance component due to pen effects for gain through 8 periods; and 4) models with genetic and environmental competition effects accounted for nearly all of the variance traditionally attributed to pen effects (even though estimates of the competition variance component were small, the estimates of pen variance were near zero).
引用
收藏
页码:1625 / 1633
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
Arango J, 2005, J ANIM SCI, V83, P1241
[3]  
Boldman KG, 1995, MANUAL USE MTDFREML
[4]  
Cassady JP, 2005, J ANIM SCI, V83, P6
[5]  
Federer W.T., 1955, Experimental design: Theory and application, Vthird
[6]   A DERIVATIVE-FREE APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING VARIANCE-COMPONENTS IN ANIMAL-MODELS BY RESTRICTED MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD [J].
GRASER, HU ;
SMITH, SP ;
TIER, B .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1987, 64 (05) :1362-1370
[8]   SIMPLE METHOD FOR COMPUTING INVERSE OF A NUMERATOR RELATIONSHIP MATRIX USED IN PREDICTION OF BREEDING VALUES [J].
HENDERSON, CR .
BIOMETRICS, 1976, 32 (01) :69-83
[9]   CUMULATIVE SELECTION AND GENETIC CHANGE FOR WEANING OR YEARLING WEIGHT OR FOR YEARLING WEIGHT PLUS MUSCLE SCORE IN HEREFORD CATTLE [J].
KOCH, RM ;
CUNDIFF, LV ;
GREGORY, KE .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1994, 72 (04) :864-885
[10]   SELECTION IN BEEF-CATTLE .1. SELECTION APPLIED AND GENERATION INTERVAL [J].
KOCH, RM ;
GREGORY, KE ;
CUNDIFF, LV .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1974, 39 (03) :449-470