Stakeholder Marketing: Why "Stakeholder" Was Omitted from the American Marketing Association's Official 2007 Definition of Marketing and Why the Future Is Bright for Stakeholder Marketing
被引:15
作者:
Gundlach, Gregory T.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ N Florida, Dept Mkt & Logist, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
Amer Antitrust Inst, Washington, DC USAUniv N Florida, Dept Mkt & Logist, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
Gundlach, Gregory T.
[1
,2
]
Wilkie, William L.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Notre Dame, Mendoza Coll Business, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USAUniv N Florida, Dept Mkt & Logist, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
Wilkie, William L.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Univ N Florida, Dept Mkt & Logist, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Amer Antitrust Inst, Washington, DC USA
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Mendoza Coll Business, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
definition of marketing;
corporate social responsibility;
stakeholder marketing;
D O I:
10.1509/jppm.29.1.89
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
In 2004, the term "stakeholder" was included for the first time in the official definition of marketing issued by the American Marketing Association (AMA). This was a notable change because the official definition had been revised only twice in 70 years. Furthermore, it appeared to cement the concept of stakeholder marketing as central to the field's body of thought. Then, in 2007, the American Marketing Association revised the 2004 definition, replacing it with a new offering in which the term "stakeholder" was no longer present. Was this a setback for the stakeholder concept, even a repudiation of it? This short essay briefly explains what happened behind the scenes, why the revision occurred, and what this might mean for the future for the stakeholder marketing movement.