Influences of low-energy input microwave and ultrasonic pretreatments on single-stage and temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) of municipal wastewater sludge

被引:43
作者
Akgul, Deniz [1 ,2 ]
Cella, Monica Angela [1 ]
Eskicioglu, Cigdem [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Sch Engn, Bioreactor Technol Grp, Okanagan Campus,1137 Alumni Ave, Kelowna, BC V1V 1V7, Canada
[2] Marmara Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Gortepe Campus, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkey
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; TPAD; Microwave; Sonication; Electrical energy; Pretreatment; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; THERMAL PRETREATMENTS; SALMONELLA SPP; FECAL-COLIFORMS; SOLUBILIZATION; IRRADIATION; PERFORMANCE; DISINTEGRATION; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.152
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The effect of low energy-input (2.5 IcJig total solids) microwave (MW) irradiation and ultrasonication (US) on single-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion (AD) and temperature-phased AD (TPAD) treating wastewater sludge was assessed. The goal was to achieve a higher net energy along with improved digestate for agricultural applications. At sludge retention times (SRT) of 20 and 14 days, TPAD achieved significantly (39-45%) higher methane production, pathogen destruction (4-log) and digester volume reductions compared to single-stage AD (controls). The higher methane yields resulted in higher net energies for TPAD (4.7-5.1 kJ/g volatile solids or VS) compared to controls (3.3-3.7 kJ/g VS). Although improvements in organic removals and methane yields were observed after MW and US. the energy input for pretreatments were not compensated by the increased methane production, and therefore were concluded to be infeasible for industrial applications for single-stage and TPAD. All TPADs provided the highest pathogenic removal, and met the Class A biosolids fecal coliform requirements, while MW pretreatment achieved the highest fecal coliform removal for single-stage AD with digestates classified as Class B. Digesters incorporating thermal pretreatment (MW and MW + TPAD) yielded the highest amount of extra heat (4.2-5.8 kJ/g VS) that could be utilized within/outside of the facility. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 282
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, Theory and practice of water and wastewater treatment
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Standard methods for the examination of water and waste- water
  • [4] Influence of microwave pre-treatment on sludge solubilization and pilot scale semi-continuous anaerobic digestion
    Appels, Lise
    Houtmeyers, Sofie
    Degreve, Jan
    Van Impe, Jan
    Dewil, Raf
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 128 : 598 - 603
  • [5] Microwave technology for energy-efficient processing of waste
    Appleton, TJ
    Colder, RI
    Kingman, SW
    Lowndes, IS
    Read, AG
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2005, 81 (01) : 85 - 113
  • [6] Effect of process configuration and substrate complexity on the performance of anaerobic processes
    Azbar, N
    Ursillo, P
    Speece, RE
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (03) : 817 - 829
  • [7] FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF PRIMARY AND DIGESTED SEWAGE-SLUDGE
    BHATTACHARYA, SN
    [J]. RHEOLOGICA ACTA, 1981, 20 (03) : 288 - 298
  • [8] Effect of ultrasonic, thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilisation and anaerobic biodegradability
    Bougrier, C.
    Albasi, C.
    Delgenes, J. P.
    Carrere, H.
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AND PROCESSING-PROCESS INTENSIFICATION, 2006, 45 (08) : 711 - 718
  • [9] Solubilisation of waste-activated sludge by ultrasonic treatment
    Bougrier, C
    Carrère, H
    Delgenès, JP
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2005, 106 (02) : 163 - 169
  • [10] Energy feasibility study of sludge pretreatments: A review
    Cano, R.
    Perez-Elvira, S. I.
    Fdz-Polanco, F.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 149 : 176 - 185