Application of the CT/MRI LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Feasibility Study

被引:3
作者
Ruan, Si-Min [1 ]
Cheng, Mei-Qing [1 ]
Huang, Hui [1 ]
Hu, Hang-Tong [1 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Xie, Xiao-Yan [1 ]
Lu, Ming-De [1 ,2 ]
Kuang, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Man-Xia [1 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Ultrasound, Dept Med Ultrason, Affiliated Hosp 1, 58 Zhongshan Rd 2, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System; treatment response; hepatocellular carcinoma; locoregional therapy; DRUG-ELUTING BEADS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; CT; MRI;
D O I
10.2147/JHC.S353914
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: The contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (TRA) is still in development. The aim of this study was to explore whether the CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS in evaluating the liver locoregional therapy (LRT) response. Patients and Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing ablation between July 2017 and December 2018. The standard criteria for a viable lesion were a histopathologically confirmed or typical viable appearance in the follow-up CT/MRI. Performance of the LI-RADS TRA assessing tumor viability was then compared between CEUS and CT/MRI. Inter-reader association was calculated. Results: A total of 244 patients with 389 treated observations (118 viable) were evaluated. The sensitivity and specificity of the CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA viable categories for predicting viable lesions were 55.0% (65/118) versus 56.8% (67/118) (P = 0.480) and 99.3% (269/271) versus 96.3% (261/271) (P = 0.013), respectively. The PPV of CEUS was higher than that of CT/MRI (97.0% vs 87.0%). Subgroup analysis showed that the sensitivity was low in the 1-month assessment for both CEUS (38.1%, 16/42) and CT/MR (47.6%, 20/42) and higher in the 2???6-month assessment for both CEUS (65.7%, 23/35) and CT/MR (62.9%, 22/35). Interobserver agreements were substantial for both CEUS TRA and CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA (??, 0.74 for both). Conclusion: The CT/MRI LI-RADS TRA features were applicable to CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy. The CEUS TRA for liver locoregional therapy has sufficiently high specificity and PPV to diagnose the viability of lesions after ablation.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 451
页数:15
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Short-Term Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Locoregional Treatment
    Ainora, Maria Elena
    Iezzi, Roberto
    Ponziani, Francesca Romana
    Garcovich, Matteo
    Di Stasio, Enrico
    Riccardi, Laura
    Annicchiarico, Brigida Eleonora
    Abbate, Valeria
    De Gaetano, Anna Maria
    Siciliano, Massimo
    Grieco, Antonio
    Rapaccini, Gian Lodovico
    Gasbarrini, Antonio
    Pompili, Maurizio
    Zocco, Maria Assunta
    [J]. DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2020, 38 (06) : 522 - 533
  • [2] American College of Radiology, 2018, Liver imaging reporting and data system version 2018
  • [3] American College of Radiology, 2017, LIV IM REP DAT SYST
  • [4] Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Techniques for Guiding and Assessing Response to Locoregional Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Andreana, Lorenzo
    Kudo, Masatoshi
    Hatanaka, Kinuyo
    Chung, Hobyung
    Minami, Yasunori
    Maekawa, Kiyoshi
    Ruggiero, Giuseppe
    [J]. ONCOLOGY, 2010, 78 : 68 - 77
  • [5] Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI
    Bae, Jae Seok
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Kyoung Bun
    Kim, Haeryoung
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2021, 299 (02) : 336 - 345
  • [6] Hepatocellular cancer response to radiofrequency tumor ablation: contrast-enhanced ultrasound
    Bartolotta, Tommaso Vincenzo
    Taibbi, Adele
    Midiri, Massimo
    De Maria, Marcello
    [J]. ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2008, 33 (05): : 501 - 511
  • [7] Hepatocellular carcinoma locoregional therapies for patients in the waiting list. Impact on transplantability and recurrence rate
    Cescon, Matteo
    Cucchetti, Alessandro
    Ravaioli, Matteo
    Pinna, Antonio Daniele
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 58 (03) : 609 - 618
  • [8] The LI-RADS Version 2018 MRI Treatment Response Algorithm: Evaluation of Ablated Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chaudhry, Mohammad
    McGinty, Katrina A.
    Mervak, Benjamin
    Lerebours, Reginald
    Li, Cai
    Shropshire, Erin
    Ronald, James
    Commander, Leah
    Hertel, Johann
    Luo, Sheng
    Bashir, Mustafa R.
    Burke, Lauren M. B.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2020, 294 (02) : 320 - 326
  • [9] Validation of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Treatment Response Criteria After Thermal Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Cools, Katherine S.
    Moon, Andrew M.
    Burke, Lauren M. B.
    McGinty, Katrina A.
    Strassle, Paula D.
    Gerber, David A.
    [J]. LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 26 (02) : 203 - 214
  • [10] Dietrich CF, 2020, ULTRASCHALL MED, V41, P562, DOI [10.1055/a-1177-0530, 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.04.030]