Who becomes a tenured professor, and why? Panel data evidence from German sociology, 1980-2013

被引:106
作者
Lutter, Mark [1 ]
Schroeder, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Inst Study Soc, Paulstr 3, D-50676 Cologne, Germany
[2] Univ Marburg, Ketzerbach 11, D-35037 Marburg, Germany
关键词
Academic careers; Tenure; Human capital; Social capital; Symbolic capital; Gender; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; SEX-DIFFERENCES; ACADEMIC MARKETPLACE; PRODUCTIVITY; PRESTIGE; SCIENCE; DETERMINANTS; MOBILITY; CAREERS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.019
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Prior studies that try to explain who gets tenure and why remain inconclusive, especially on whether non-meritocratic factors influence who becomes a professor. Based on career and publication data of virtually all sociologists working in German sociology departments, we test how meritocratic factors (academic productivity) as well as non-meritocratic factors (ascription, symbolic and social capital) influence the chances of getting a permanent professorship in sociology. Our findings show that getting tenure in sociology is strongly related to scholarly output, as previous studies have shown. Improving on existing studies, however, we show specifically that each refereed journal article and each monograph increases a sociologist's chance for tenure by 10 to 15 percent, while other publications affect odds for tenure only marginally and in some cases even negatively. Regarding non-meritocratic factors, we show that network size, individual reputation, and gender matters. Women get their first permanent position as university professor with on average 23 to 44 percent fewer publications than men; all else being equal, they are about 1.4 times more likely to get tenure than men. The article generally contributes to a better understanding of the role of meritocratic and non-meritocratic factors in achieving scarce and highly competitive job positions in academia. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:999 / 1013
页数:15
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   CUMULATIVE ADVANTAGE AND INEQUALITY IN SCIENCE [J].
ALLISON, PD ;
LONG, JS ;
KRAUZE, TK .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1982, 47 (05) :615-625
[2]   DEPARTMENTAL EFFECTS ON SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTIVITY [J].
ALLISON, PD ;
LONG, JS .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1990, 55 (04) :469-478
[3]  
Althaber A., 2011, GEMEINSAM KARRIERE M, P83
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1893, De la Division du travail social: etude sur l'organisation des societes superieures
[5]  
Arrow K. J., 1972, Racial discrimination in economic life, P83
[6]   Non-tenured post-doctoral researchers' job mobility and research output: An analysis of the role of research discipline, department size, and coauthors [J].
Baeker, Agnes .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) :634-650
[7]  
Baier C, 2013, KOLNER Z SOZIOL SOZ, V65, P129, DOI 10.1007/s11577-013-0191-z
[9]  
Becker G.S., 1960, The American Economic Review, V50, P346
[10]  
Becker Gary., 1971, EC DISCRIMINATION, DOI DOI 10.7208/CHICAGO/9780226041049.001.0001