Measuring women's decisionmaking: Indicator choice and survey design experiments from cash and food transfer evaluations in Ecuador, Uganda and Yemen

被引:36
作者
Peterman, Amber [1 ]
Schwab, Benjamin [2 ]
Roy, Shalini [3 ]
Hidrobo, Melissa [4 ]
Gilligan, Daniel O. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Publ Policy, 3435 Abernathy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Kansas State, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[3] Int Food Policy Res Inst IFPRI, Poverty Hlth & Nutr Div PHND, Washington, DC USA
[4] IFPRI Dakar, PHND, Washington, DC USA
[5] IFPRI, PHND, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Women's decision making; Women's empowerment; Gender; Transfer programs; RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT; AFRICA DEVELOPMENT; EMPOWERMENT; AGRICULTURE; VOUCHERS; AGENCY; INDEX; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105387
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Women's decisionmaking indicators are widely used in social science research, though insufficient attention is given to measurement issues. We interrogate variations in indicator construction using survey experiments undertaken in the context of transfer programs in Ecuador, Yemen, and Uganda. Findings show that small variations can lead to meaningful differences in how women are ranked on decisionmaking, as well as change conclusions on whether programs have significant impacts on decisionmaking. Results also raise questions as to how well indicators capture dimensions of empowerment as they are not consistently associated with measures of women's status. Finally, in the context of Uganda, results indicate that measures are susceptible to social desirability bias, however further investigation is needed to assess this potential. We conclude that choices made in indicator construction matter and in the absence of standardized guidance, current practice is ad-hoc. Further, despite the wide use of these indicators, evaluating program success on women's empowerment solely through standard decisionmaking indicators is not recommended. Finally, measurement innovation utilizing context-specific understanding of intra-household dynamics is needed. (c) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   What does it Mean to Make a 'Joint' Decision? Unpacking Intra-household Decision Making in Agriculture: Implications for Policy and Practice [J].
Acosta, Mariola ;
van Wessel, Margit ;
van Bommel, Severine ;
Ampaire, Edidah L. ;
Twyman, Jennifer ;
Jassogne, Laurence ;
Feindt, Peter H. .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2020, 56 (06) :1210-1229
[2]   Conservative outlook, gender norms and female wellbeing: Evidence from rural Bangladesh [J].
Ahmed, Tanima ;
Sen, Binayak .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 111 :41-58
[3]   The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index [J].
Alkire, Sabina ;
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth ;
Peterman, Amber ;
Quisumbing, Agnes ;
Seymour, Greg ;
Vaz, Ana .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 52 :71-91
[4]   Couples' reports of women's autonomy and health-care use in Nepal [J].
Allendorf, Keera .
STUDIES IN FAMILY PLANNING, 2007, 38 (01) :35-46
[5]   Measuring and Changing Control: Women's Empowerment and Targeted Transfers [J].
Almas, Ingvild ;
Armand, Alex ;
Attanasio, Orazio ;
Carneiro, Pedro .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2018, 128 (612) :F609-F639
[6]   Bargaining with Grandma The Impact of the South African Pension on Household Decision-Making [J].
Ambler, Kate .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 2016, 51 (04) :900-932
[7]   Husband and Wife Perspectives on Farm Household Decision-making Authority and Evidence on Intra-household Accord in Rural Tanzania [J].
Anderson, C. Leigh ;
Reynolds, Travis W. ;
Gugerty, Mary Kay .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 90 :169-183
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Women, business and the law 2020
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Social Institutions and Gender Index: Timor Leste
[10]   Household Bargaining and Excess Fertility: An Experimental Study in Zambia [J].
Ashraf, Nava ;
Field, Erica ;
Lee, Jean .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (07) :2210-2237