Humic acid fouling during ultrafiltration

被引:385
作者
Yuan, W [1 ]
Zydney, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Chem Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es0012366
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recent studies have shown that natural organic matter (e.g., humic and fulvic acids) is a major foulant during ultrafiltration of surface water. The objective of this study was to develop a more complete understanding of the mechanisms governing humic acid fouling, including the effects of humic acid adsorption, concentration polarization, and aggregate deposition on the rate and extent of fouling. Data were obtained with Aldrich and Suwannee River humic acids using ultrafiltration membranes with a broad range of molecular weight cutoffs. Fouled membranes were also examined using streaming potential and contact angle measurements. The extent of flux decline was greatest for the largest molecular weight cutoff membranes due to the greater relative hydraulic resistance of the humic acid deposit formed on the surface of these membranes. This humic acid deposit reduced the apparent zeta potential and increased the membrane contact angle. Simple static adsorption and concentration polarization caused relatively little flux decline. Humic acid aggregates had a significant effect on fouling only for the larger molecular weight cutoff membranes. The rate and extent of humic acid fouling increased at low pH, high ionic strength, and in the presence of calcium due to changes in intermolecular electrostatic interactions. These results provide important insights into the mechanisms of humic acid fouling during ultrafiltration.
引用
收藏
页码:5043 / 5050
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF ULTRAFILTRATION FOR DETERMINING MOLECULAR-WEIGHT OF FULVIC-ACID [J].
AIKEN, GR .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1984, 18 (12) :978-981
[2]   Interactions between natural organic matter (NOM) and membranes: Rejection and fouling [J].
Amy, G ;
Cho, J .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 40 (09) :131-139
[3]  
*AWWA MEMBR TECHN, 1992, J AWWA, V84, P59
[4]  
Bersillon J. L., 1988, FUTURE IND PROSPECTS, P234
[5]   Buffer effects on the zeta potential of ultrafiltration membranes [J].
Burns, DB ;
Zydney, AL .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2000, 172 (1-2) :39-48
[6]  
Burns DB, 1999, BIOTECHNOL BIOENG, V64, P27, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19990705)64:1<27::AID-BIT3>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-5
[8]   A COMPARISON OF WATER SOLUBILITY ENHANCEMENTS OF ORGANIC SOLUTES BY AQUATIC HUMIC MATERIALS AND COMMERCIAL HUMIC ACIDS [J].
CHIOU, CT ;
KILE, DE ;
BRINTON, TI ;
MALCOLM, RL ;
LEENHEER, JA ;
MACCARTHY, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 21 (12) :1231-1234
[9]   Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes [J].
Cho, JW ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J .
WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (11) :2517-2526
[10]   Characterization of clean and natural organic matter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes, and foulants characterization [J].
Cho, JW ;
Amy, G ;
Pellegrino, J ;
Yoon, YM .
DESALINATION, 1998, 118 (1-3) :101-108