Cytotoxicity of cis-[((1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N′)bis(myristato)]-platinum (II) suspended in lipiodol in a newly established cisplatin-resistant rat hepatoma cell line

被引:28
作者
Kishimoto, S [1 ]
Miyazawa, K [1 ]
Terakawa, Y [1 ]
Ashikari, H [1 ]
Ohtani, A [1 ]
Fukushima, S [1 ]
Takeuchi, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Gakuin Univ, Fac Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharmaceut, Nishi Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6512180, Japan
来源
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH | 2000年 / 91卷 / 12期
关键词
lipiodol; cisplatin; hepatocellular carcinoma; sustained release; resistance;
D O I
10.1111/j.1349-7006.2000.tb00921.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The cytotoxic activity of cis-[((1R,2R)-1,2-cyclohexanediamine-N,N')bis(myristato)]platinum (II) (SM-11355) was evaluated in a cisplatin (CDDP)-resistant tumor cell line, and compared with that of CDDP. H4-II-E/CDDP with acquired resistance to CDDP was established by continuous exposure of a rat hepatic tumor line, H4-II-E, to increasing concentrations of CDDP over 12 months. Compared with the parental cell line, this cell line exhibited an 8.8-fold increase in resistance to CDDP and was not cross-resistant to 1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum (II) dichloride (DPC). There were no differences in sensitivity to six non-platinum antitumor drugs between H4-II-E and H4-II-E/CDDP, which suggests that H4-II-E/CDDP is not multidrug-resistant. Intracellular platinum accumulation and the formation of a platinum-DNA adduct following CDDP exposure were significantly reduced in H4-II-E/CDDP compared to the parental cell line. The acquired CDDP resistance in H4-II-E/CDDP appeared to be predominantly due to reduced CDDP uptake. H4-II-E/ CDDP was also resistant to CDDP suspended in Lipiodol (CDDP/Lipiodol), but was not cross-resistant to SM-11355 suspended in Lipiodol (SM-11355/Lipiodol). Also, there were no differences in intracellular platinum accumulation or the formation of platinum-DNA adducts after SM-11355/Lipiodol exposure between H4-II-E and H4-11-E/CDDP. These results suggest that acquired CDDP resistance in H4-II-E/CDDP does not influence the cytotoxic activity of SM-11355/Lipiodol.
引用
收藏
页码:1326 / 1332
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ANDREWS PA, 1990, CANCER CELL-MON REV, V2, P35
[2]  
CHRISTIAN MC, 1992, SEMIN ONCOL, V19, P720
[3]  
Fink D, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P4881
[4]  
GIBBONS GR, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, P6497
[5]   P-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance [J].
Gottesman, MM ;
Pastan, I ;
Ambudkar, SV .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 1996, 6 (05) :610-617
[6]   ASSESSMENT OF CHEMOEMBOLIZATION THERAPY FOR PRIMARY LIVER-CANCER USING A STABILIZED ADRIAMYCIN-LIPIODOL SUSPENSION [J].
HORIGUCHI, Y ;
ITOH, M ;
TAKAGAWA, H ;
IMAI, H ;
KAMEI, A ;
SEKOGUCHI, B ;
NAGAMURA, Y .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 31 :S60-S64
[7]   COMPARISON OF THE ANTICANCER EFFECT OF ADMOS ALONE AND ADMOS WITH CDDP IN THE TREATMENT OF HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA BY INTRAARTERIAL INJECTION [J].
IKEDA, K ;
INOUE, H ;
YANO, T ;
KOBAYASHI, H ;
NAKAJO, M .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1992, 31 :S65-S68
[8]  
ISHIYAMA M, 1993, CHEM PHARM BULL, V41, P1118, DOI 10.1248/cpb.41.1118
[9]  
IWAI K, 1984, CANCER RES, V44, P2115
[10]  
Johnson SW, 1997, CANCER RES, V57, P850