Auditory speech detection in noise enhanced by lipreading

被引:133
作者
Bernstein, LE
Auer, ET
Takayanagi, S
机构
[1] House Ear Res Inst, Dept Commun Neurosci, Los Angeles, CA 90057 USA
[2] Natl Sci Fdn, Arlington, VA 22230 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
audiovisual speech processing; speech detection in noise; speech in noise; audiovisual speech perception; speech processing; lipreading; speechreading;
D O I
10.1016/j.specom.2004.10.011
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Audiovisual speech stimuli have been shown to produce a variety of perceptual phenomena. Enhanced detectability of acoustic speech in noise, when the talker can also be seen, is one of those phenomena. This study investigated whether this enhancement effect is specific to visual speech stimuli or can rely on more generic non-speech visual stimulus properties. Speech detection thresholds for an auditory /ba/ stimulus were obtained in a white noise masker. The auditory /ba/ was presented adaptively to obtain its 79.4% detection threshold under five conditions. In Experiment 1, the syllable was presented (1) auditory-only (AO) and (2) as audiovisual speech (AVS), using the original video recording. Three types of synthetic visual stimuli were also paired synchronously with the audio token: (3) A dynamic Lissajous (AVL) figure whose vertical extent was correlated with the acoustic speech envelope; (4) a dynamic rectangle (AVR) whose horizontal extent was correlated with the speech envelope; and (5) a static rectangle (AVSR) whose onset and offset were synchronous with the acoustic speech onset and offset. Ten adults with normal hearing and vision participated. The results, in terms of dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), were AVS < (AVL approximate to AVR approximate to ASR) < AO. That is, AVS was significantly easiest to detect, there was no difference among the synthesized visual stimuli, and all audiovisual conditions resulted in significantly lower thresholds than AO. To determine the advantage of the AVS stimulus, in Experiment 2, a preliminary mouth gesture was edited from the video speech token. This manipulation defeated the advantage for both the original and the edited AVS stimulus, while the audiovisual detection enhancement persisted. Overall, the results showed enhanced auditory speech detection with visual stimuli but no advantage for a fine-grained correlation between acoustic and optical speech signals. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 18
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, S361989 ANSI
[2]   Bisensory augmentation: A speechreading advantage when speech is clearly audible and intact [J].
Arnold, P ;
Hill, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 92 :339-355
[3]  
Bernstein L., 2004, HDB MULTISENSORY PRO
[4]   Speech perception without hearing [J].
Bernstein, LE ;
Demorest, ME ;
Tucker, PE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (02) :233-252
[5]   Electrophysiology of spatial scene analysis: the mismatch negativity (MMN) is sensitive to the ventriloquism illusion [J].
Colin, C ;
Radeau, M ;
Soquet, A ;
Dachy, B ;
Deltenre, P .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (04) :507-518
[6]   Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity [J].
De Gelder, B ;
Bertelson, P .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2003, 7 (10) :460-467
[7]   Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans - A framework for defining "early" visual processing [J].
Foxe, JJ ;
Simpson, GV .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 142 (01) :139-150
[8]   The effect of speechreading on masked detection thresholds for filtered speech [J].
Grant, KW .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 109 (05) :2272-2275
[9]   The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences [J].
Grant, KW ;
Seitz, PF .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2000, 108 (03) :1197-1208
[10]  
Krolak-Salmon P., 2001, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V27, P913