Exploring Connections Between First and Second Language Fluency: A Mixed Methods Approach

被引:28
作者
Peltonen, Pauliina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept English, Koskenniemenkatu 4, Turku 20014, Finland
关键词
fluency; mixed methods; oral proficiency; second language learning; WITHIN-SPEAKER VARIATION; HESITATION PHENOMENA; ADVANCED LEARNERS; SPEECH PRODUCTION; BETWEEN-SPEAKER; LANGUAGE; L1; UTTERANCE; ACCURACY; PAUSES;
D O I
10.1111/modl.12516
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Many factors influencing second language (L2) speech fluency have been widely studied, but the effects of first language (L1) fluency on L2 speech fluency are still relatively poorly understood. In contrast to mostly quantitative previous studies, the present study adopted a mixed methods approach to examining the connections between L1 fluency and L2 fluency. Monologue speech samples in L1 and L2 were obtained from 42 Finnish learners of English at 2 school levels (9th grade and upper secondary school). The samples were examined for 13 measures capturing different aspects of fluency: temporal fluency, including speed and pausing, and stalling mechanisms. The results indicated positive correlations between the majority of temporal L1 and L2 fluency measures. Regression analyses further demonstrated that most temporal L2 fluency measures could be predicted from L1 fluency measures to a certain extent, although the predictive power varied across the measures. Regarding stalling mechanisms, a complementary qualitative analysis provided insights to idiosyncratic patterns in their use in L1 and L2. Together, the findings suggest that L1 fluency is an important factor in explaining L2 fluency and should be more widely acknowledged in L2 fluency research, assessment, and teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:676 / 692
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ANAL CELL PATHOL, DOI DOI 10.1155/2010/519498
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, System, DOI [10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001, DOI 10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2004.01.001]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, SPEECH PROSODY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, DIMENSIONS L2 PERFOR
[5]  
[Anonymous], PERCEPTION PRODUCTIO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, THESIS
[7]   Does Measuring L2 Utterance Fluency Equal Measuring Overall L2 Proficiency? Evidence From Five Languages [J].
Baker-Smemoe, Wendy ;
Dewey, Dan P. ;
Bown, Jennifer ;
Martinsen, Rob A. .
FOREIGN LANGUAGE ANNALS, 2014, 47 (04) :707-728
[8]  
Boersma P., 2016, PRAAT WEBSITE
[9]   What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs [J].
Bosker, Hans Rutger ;
Pinget, Anne-France ;
Quene, Hugo ;
Sanders, Ted ;
de Jong, Nivja H. .
LANGUAGE TESTING, 2013, 30 (02) :159-175
[10]   Language-independent talker-specificity in first-language and second-language speech production by bilingual talkers: L1 speaking rate predicts L2 speaking rate [J].
Bradlow, Ann R. ;
Kim, Midam ;
Blasingame, Michael .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2017, 141 (02) :886-899