Direct and indirect effects of predation and predation risk in old-field interaction webs

被引:281
作者
Schmitz, OJ
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Forestry & Environm Studies, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, New Haven, CT 06511 USA
关键词
food web interactions; indirect effects; density-mediated indirect effects; trait-mediated indirect effects; predation; old-field arthropods;
D O I
10.1086/286122
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Indirect effects emerge when a change in the: abundance of one species indirectly affects another by changing the abundances of intermediate species-called density-mediated indirect effects-or they arise when one species modifies how two other species interact-called trait-mediated indirect effects. I report on field experiments that evaluated how grass and herb biomass in old-field interaction webs was influenced indirectly by a spider carnivore through its interactions with a generalist and a grass-specialist grasshopper species. I manipulated interaction pathways between the spider and the plants using different combinations of the grasshopper species. I changed the modality of predator-prey interactions to isolate density-mediated from trait-mediated effects using natural spiders (predation spiders) or spiders that were prevented from subduing prey by mouthpart manipulation (risk spiders). I found that indirect effects were stronger in speciose, reticulate food webs than in linear food chains owing to a trait-mediated effect, a diet shift by herbivores in response to predation risk. Spiders alone did not have significant effects on grasshopper densities in the field experiments, removing any possibility of density-mediated indirect effects. The study illustrates that ecologists should not underestimate the importance of behavioral ecology in determining community-level interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 342
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
[22]   A graphical model of keystone predators in food webs: Trophic regulation of abundance, incidence, and diversity patterns in communities [J].
Leibold, MA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1996, 147 (05) :784-812
[23]   THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY [J].
LEVIN, SA .
ECOLOGY, 1992, 73 (06) :1943-1967
[24]   BEHAVIORAL DECISIONS MADE UNDER THE RISK OF PREDATION - A REVIEW AND PROSPECTUS [J].
LIMA, SL ;
DILL, LM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 1990, 68 (04) :619-640
[25]   LIFE-HISTORY STRATEGIES FOR ENERGY GAIN AND PREDATOR AVOIDANCE UNDER TIME CONSTRAINTS [J].
LUDWIG, D ;
ROWE, L .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1990, 135 (05) :686-707
[26]   TOWARDS A UNIFIED FORAGING THEORY [J].
MANGEL, M ;
CLARK, CW .
ECOLOGY, 1986, 67 (05) :1127-1138
[27]   Interactions between fish, grazing invertebrates and algae in a New Zealand stream: A trophic cascade mediated by fish induced changes to grazer behaviour? [J].
McIntosh, AR ;
Townsend, CR .
OECOLOGIA, 1996, 108 (01) :174-181
[28]   STARVATION AND PREDATION AS FACTORS LIMITING POPULATION-SIZE [J].
MCNAMARA, JM ;
HOUSTON, AI .
ECOLOGY, 1987, 68 (05) :1515-1519
[29]   THE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN FORAGING OPTIONS ON INTAKE RATE AND PREDATION RATE [J].
MCNAMARA, JM ;
HOUSTON, AI .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1994, 144 (06) :978-1000
[30]   Detection of direct versus indirect effects: Were experiments long enough? [J].
Menge, BA .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1997, 149 (05) :801-823