An epidemiologic study of mild cognitive impairment in Kolkata, India

被引:115
作者
Das, S. K.
Bose, P.
Biswas, A.
Dutt, A.
Banerjee, T. K.
Hazra, A.
Raut, D. K.
Chaudhuri, A.
Roy, T.
机构
[1] Bangur Inst Neurol, Dept Neurol, Kolkata 700027, W Bengal, India
[2] All India Inst Hyg & Publ Hlth, Natl Neurosci Ctr, Kolkata 700027, W Bengal, India
[3] All India Inst Hyg & Publ Hlth, Dept Pharmacol, Kolkata 700027, W Bengal, India
[4] All India Inst Hyg & Publ Hlth, Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res, Kolkata 700027, W Bengal, India
[5] Indian Stat Inst, Kolkata 700035, W Bengal, India
关键词
D O I
10.1212/01.wnl.0000264424.76759.e6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of two types of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) - amnestic and multiple domain types -among nondemented and nondepressed elderly subjects aged 50 and older. Methods: The study was carried out in Kolkata, the eastern metropolis of India. A cross-sectional community screening was carried out, and 960 subjects were selected by systematic random sampling for the assessment of cognitive function with the help of a validated cognitive questionnaire battery administered through house-to-house survey. A case-control study was also undertaken to identify potential risk factors through univariate analysis. Results: Ultimately, full evaluation of cognitive function was possible in 745 of 960 subjects. An overall prevalence of MCI detected based on neuropsychological testing was 14.89% (95% CI: 12.19 to 17.95). Prevalence of the amnestic type was 6.04% (95% CI: 4.40 to 8.1) and that of the multiple domain type was 8.85% (95% CI: 6.81 to 11.32). Adjusted for age, education. and gender, the amnestic type was more common among men and the multiple domain type among women with advancement of age. Rates differed considerably with educational attainment. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were the major risk factors for both types of MCI. Conclusion: In this first community-based study of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from India, prevalence of the amnestic type is comparable with and that of the multiple domain type is less than the prevalence in developed countries. Variations in age, education, and gender specific prevalence of MCI of both types were encountered. The putative risk factors identified merit further study.
引用
收藏
页码:2019 / 2026
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Progression to dementia in clinical subtypes of mild cognitive impairment [J].
Alexopoulos, P. ;
Grimmer, T. ;
Perneczky, R. ;
Domes, G. ;
Kurz, A. .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2006, 22 (01) :27-34
[2]  
[Anonymous], DIAGN STAT MAN DIS
[3]   Mild cognitive impairment: prevalence and predictive validity according to current approaches [J].
Busse, A ;
Bischkopf, J ;
Riedel-Heller, SG ;
Angermeyer, MC .
ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 108 (02) :71-81
[4]  
Das SK, 2006, INDIAN J MED RES, V124, P163
[5]  
Das SK., 2006, Neurol Asia, V11, P37
[6]   Cognitive impairment without dementia in older people: Prevalence, vascular risk factors, impact on disability. The Italian longitudinal study on aging [J].
Di Carlo, A ;
Baldereschi, M ;
Amaducci, L ;
Maggi, S ;
Grigoletto, F ;
Scarlato, G ;
Inzitari, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2000, 48 (07) :775-782
[7]  
Feldman HH, 2005, AM J GERIAT PSYCHIAT, V13, P645, DOI 10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.8.645
[8]   Variations in case definition affect prevalence but not outcomes of mild cognitive impairment [J].
Fisk, JD ;
Merry, HR ;
Rockwood, K .
NEUROLOGY, 2003, 61 (09) :1179-1184
[9]  
Ganguli M, 1999, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V14, P807, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199910)14:10<807::AID-GPS31>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-#