Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Disc Displacement of the Temporomandibular Joint Compared With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:27
作者
Cakir-Ozkan, Niluefer [1 ]
Sarikaya, Basar [2 ]
Erkorkmaz, Unal [3 ]
Akturk, Yeliz [2 ]
机构
[1] Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Med, Clin Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokat, Turkey
[2] Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Tokat, Turkey
[3] Gaziosmanpasa Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, Tokat, Turkey
关键词
INTERNAL DERANGEMENT; ACCURACY; SONOGRAPHY; MRI;
D O I
10.1016/j.joms.2009.08.010
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: We compared high-resolution ultrasonography with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as the gold standard, to evaluate lateral and anterior capsule-condyle distances to detect disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint. Materials and Methods: This study included 28 patients (19 female and 9 male; age range, 16-51 years; mean age, 32.82 years), and in total, 56 joints were assessed with ultrasonography and MRI. Measurements were obtained for anterior capsule-condyle and lateral capsule-condyle distances in both open- and closed-mouth positions with high-resolution ultrasonography. These findings were also compared with those of MRI taken as reference. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess our results. We assessed sensitivities, specificities, accuracies, and positive and negative predictive values for both open- and closed-mouth positions. Results: Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonographic anterior capsule-condyle distance in the closed-mouth position to detect MRI-positive disc displacement (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.689; P = .015) was the highest. Conclusions: The measurement of the distance between the most anterior point of the articular capsule and the most anterior point of the condyle can be used to assess disc displacement in diseased joints. However, it is necessary to determine the most accurate threshold value and to set cutoff values. These findings need to be confirmed by further research in a large number of patients to test the interexaminer agreement and the reproducibility of this method. (C) 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:1075-1080, 2010
引用
收藏
页码:1075 / 1080
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   AREA ABOVE ORDINAL DOMINANCE GRAPH AND AREA BELOW RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC GRAPH [J].
BAMBER, D .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1975, 12 (04) :387-415
[2]  
Braun S, 2000, ANGLE ORTHOD, V70, P383
[3]  
Elias Fernando Melhem, 2006, Braz. oral res., V20, P25, DOI 10.1590/S1806-83242006000100006
[4]   Ultrasonography of the temporomandibular joint: Where is the disc? [J].
Elias, FM ;
Birman, EG ;
Jorge, WA ;
Homsi, C .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (11) :1381-1381
[5]   The biological concept of "internal derangement and osteoarthrosis": A diagnostic approach in patients with temporomandibular joint pain? [J].
Emshoff, R ;
Innerhofer, K ;
Rudisch, A ;
Bertram, S .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2002, 93 (01) :39-44
[6]   Comparing methods for diagnosing temporomandibular joint disk displacement without reduction [J].
Emshoff, R ;
Brandlmaier, I ;
Bertram, S ;
Rudisch, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 133 (04) :442-451
[7]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[8]  
Hayashi T, 2001, AM J NEURORADIOL, V22, P728
[9]  
Katzberg R. W., 1994, DIAGNOSIS TEMPOROMAN
[10]   Anatomic disorders of the temporomandibular joint disc in asymptomatic subjects [J].
Katzberg, RW ;
Westesson, PL ;
Tallents, RH ;
Drake, CM .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1996, 54 (02) :147-153