Response of soybean genotypes to different irrigation regimes in a humid region of the southeastern USA

被引:39
|
作者
Garcia y Garcia, A. [1 ]
Persson, T. [1 ]
Guerra, L. C. [1 ]
Hoogenboom, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Griffin, GA 30223 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局; 美国农业部;
关键词
Glycine max (L.) Merr; Water use efficiency; Genotype; Irrigation scheduling; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; DEFICIT IRRIGATION; GROWTH-RATE; SEED YIELD; REGISTRATION; MANAGEMENT; STRESS; CROPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.030
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Studies on irrigation scheduling for soybean have demonstrated that avoiding irrigation during the vegetative growth stages could result in yields as high as those obtained if the crop was fully irrigated during the entire growing season. This could ultimately also lead to an improvement of the irrigation water use efficiency. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of different irrigation regimes (IRS) on growth and yield of four soybean genotypes and to determine their irrigation water use efficiency. A field experiment consisting of three IR using a lateral move sprinkler system and four soybean genotypes was conducted at the Bledsoe Research Farm of The University of Georgia, USA. The irrigation treatments consisted of full season irrigated (FSI), start irrigation at flowering (SIF), and rainfed (RFD): the soybean genotypes represented maturity groups (MGs) V. VI, VII, and VIII. A completely randomized block design in a split-plot array with four replicates was used with IR as the main treatment and the soybean MGs as the sub-treatment. Weather variables and soil moisture were recorded with an automatic weather station located nearby, while rainfall and irrigation amounts were recorded with rain gauges located in the experimental field. Samplings for growth analysis of the plant and its components as well as leaf area index (LAI) and canopy height were obtained every 12 days. The irrigation water use efficiency (I-WUE) or ratio of the difference between irrigated and rainfed yield to the amount of irrigation water applied was estimated. The results showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between IR for dry matter of the plant and its components, canopy height, and maximum leaf area index as well as significant differences (P < 0.05) between MGs due to IR. Differences for the interaction between IR and MG were significant (P < 0.05) only for dry matter of pods and seed yield. In general, seed yield increased at a rate of 7.20 kg for each mm of total water received (rainfall + irrigation) by the crop. Within IR, significant differences (P < 0.05) on I-WUE were found between maturity groups with values as low as 0.55 kg m(-3) for MG V and as high as 1.14 kg m(-3) for MG VI for the FSI treatment and values as low as 0.48 kg m(-3) for maturity group V and as high as 1.02 kg m(-3) for maturity group VI for the SIF treatment. We also found that there were genotypic differences with respect to their efficiency to use water, stressing the importance of cultivar selection as a key strategy for achieving optimum yields with reduced use of water in supplemental irrigation. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:981 / 987
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simulating yield potential by irrigation and yield gap of rainfed soybean using APEX model in a humid region
    Zhang, Bangbang
    Feng, Gary
    Kong, Xiangbin
    Lal, Rattan
    Ouyang, Ying
    Adeli, Ardeshir
    Jenkins, Johnie N.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2016, 177 : 440 - 453
  • [22] Physiology of yield determination of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under different irrigation regimes in the sub-humid zone of Sri Lanka
    De Costa, WAJM
    Shanmugathasan, KN
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2002, 75 (01) : 23 - 35
  • [23] CANOPY-AIR TEMPERATURE OF CROPS GROWN UNDER DIFFERENT IRRIGATION REGIMES IN A TEMPERATE HUMID CLIMATE
    JENSEN, HE
    SVENDSEN, H
    JENSEN, SE
    MOGENSEN, VO
    IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 1990, 11 (03) : 181 - 188
  • [24] VARIETAL RESPONSE OF RICE (ORYZA-SATIVA) TO DIFFERENT IRRIGATION REGIMES
    RAMAMOORTHY, K
    SELVARAO, KV
    CHINNASWAMI, KN
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1993, 38 (03) : 468 - 469
  • [25] Multispectral Images for Drought Stress Evaluation of Arabica Coffee Genotypes Under Different Irrigation Regimes
    da Silva, Patricia Carvalho
    Ribeiro Junior, Walter Quadros
    Ramos, Maria Lucrecia Gerosa
    Lopes, Mauricio Ferreira
    Santana, Charles Cardoso
    Casari, Raphael Augusto das Chagas Noqueli
    Brasileiro, Lemerson de Oliveira
    Veiga, Adriano Delly
    Rocha, Omar Cruz
    Malaquias, Juaci Vitoria
    Souza, Nara Oliveira Silva
    Roig, Henrique Llacer
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (22)
  • [26] Response of Corn and Redroot Pigweed to Nitrogen Fertilizer in Different Irrigation Regimes
    Gholamhoseini, Majid
    AghaAlikhani, Majid
    Sanavy, Seyed Ali Mohammad Modarres
    Mirlatifi, Seyed Majid
    Zakikhani, Hamed
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2013, 105 (04) : 1107 - 1118
  • [27] THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION REGIMES ON FLORET AND ROOT ANATOMY OF AEROBIC RICE GENOTYPES IN KHUZESTAN, IRAN
    Limouchi, K.
    Yarnia, M.
    Siyadat, A.
    Rashidi, V.
    Guilani, A.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 15 (04): : 1947 - 1970
  • [28] Response of Summer Maize Growth and Water Use to Different Irrigation Regimes
    Huang, Chao
    Ma, Shoutian
    Gao, Yang
    Liu, Zugui
    Qin, Anzhen
    Zhao, Ben
    Ning, Dongfeng
    Duan, Aiwang
    Liu, Xuchen
    Chen, Haiqing
    Liu, Zhandong
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [30] Genetic combining ability of coriander genotypes for agronomic and phytochemical traits in response to contrasting irrigation regimes
    Gholizadeh, Amir
    Dehghani, Hamid
    Khodadadi, Mostafa
    Gulick, Patrick J.
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):