Response of soybean genotypes to different irrigation regimes in a humid region of the southeastern USA

被引:39
|
作者
Garcia y Garcia, A. [1 ]
Persson, T. [1 ]
Guerra, L. C. [1 ]
Hoogenboom, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Griffin, GA 30223 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局; 美国农业部;
关键词
Glycine max (L.) Merr; Water use efficiency; Genotype; Irrigation scheduling; WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; DEFICIT IRRIGATION; GROWTH-RATE; SEED YIELD; REGISTRATION; MANAGEMENT; STRESS; CROPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.030
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Studies on irrigation scheduling for soybean have demonstrated that avoiding irrigation during the vegetative growth stages could result in yields as high as those obtained if the crop was fully irrigated during the entire growing season. This could ultimately also lead to an improvement of the irrigation water use efficiency. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of different irrigation regimes (IRS) on growth and yield of four soybean genotypes and to determine their irrigation water use efficiency. A field experiment consisting of three IR using a lateral move sprinkler system and four soybean genotypes was conducted at the Bledsoe Research Farm of The University of Georgia, USA. The irrigation treatments consisted of full season irrigated (FSI), start irrigation at flowering (SIF), and rainfed (RFD): the soybean genotypes represented maturity groups (MGs) V. VI, VII, and VIII. A completely randomized block design in a split-plot array with four replicates was used with IR as the main treatment and the soybean MGs as the sub-treatment. Weather variables and soil moisture were recorded with an automatic weather station located nearby, while rainfall and irrigation amounts were recorded with rain gauges located in the experimental field. Samplings for growth analysis of the plant and its components as well as leaf area index (LAI) and canopy height were obtained every 12 days. The irrigation water use efficiency (I-WUE) or ratio of the difference between irrigated and rainfed yield to the amount of irrigation water applied was estimated. The results showed significant differences (P < 0.05) between IR for dry matter of the plant and its components, canopy height, and maximum leaf area index as well as significant differences (P < 0.05) between MGs due to IR. Differences for the interaction between IR and MG were significant (P < 0.05) only for dry matter of pods and seed yield. In general, seed yield increased at a rate of 7.20 kg for each mm of total water received (rainfall + irrigation) by the crop. Within IR, significant differences (P < 0.05) on I-WUE were found between maturity groups with values as low as 0.55 kg m(-3) for MG V and as high as 1.14 kg m(-3) for MG VI for the FSI treatment and values as low as 0.48 kg m(-3) for maturity group V and as high as 1.02 kg m(-3) for maturity group VI for the SIF treatment. We also found that there were genotypic differences with respect to their efficiency to use water, stressing the importance of cultivar selection as a key strategy for achieving optimum yields with reduced use of water in supplemental irrigation. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:981 / 987
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Photosynthetic Response of Soybean and Cotton to Different Irrigation Regimes and Planting Geometries
    Pinnamaneni, Srinivasa R.
    Anapalli, Saseendran S.
    Reddy, Krishna N.
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [2] Yield and chemical composition of soybean seed under different irrigation regimes in the Vojvodina region
    Kresovic, Branka
    Gajic, Bosko Andrija
    Tapanarova, Angelina
    Dugalic, Goran
    PLANT SOIL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 63 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [3] Physiological response of red pepper to different irrigation regimes under drip irrigation in the Mediterranean region of Turkey
    Sezen, Semih Metin
    Yazar, Attila
    Tekin, Servet
    SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 2019, 245 : 280 - 288
  • [4] Evaluation of Agronomic Traits of Wheat Genotypes under Different Irrigation Regimes
    Hooshmandi, Babak
    Behrouzyar, Ebrahim Khalilvand
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF TROPICAL AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2018, 41 (03): : 941 - 953
  • [5] Variability of root traits in sesame genotypes under different irrigation regimes
    Hamedani, Nima Ghasemi
    Gholamhoseini, Majid
    Bazrafshan, Forrod
    Amiri, Bahram
    Habibzadeh, Farhad
    RHIZOSPHERE, 2020, 13
  • [6] Crop response to biochar under differing irrigation levels in the southeastern USA
    Lamb, Marshall C.
    Sorensen, Ronald B.
    Butts, Christopher L.
    JOURNAL OF CROP IMPROVEMENT, 2018, 32 (03) : 305 - 317
  • [7] Mango Stem Response under Different Irrigation Regimes
    Hahn, Federico
    Antonio Garcia, Jesus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRUIT SCIENCE, 2022, 22 (01) : 35 - 56
  • [8] Response of forage maize hybrids to different regimes of irrigation
    Shahrabian, Ehsan
    Soleymani, Ali
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2011, 12 (01) : 53 - 59
  • [9] Camelina production parameters response to different irrigation regimes
    Neupane, Dhurba
    Solomon, Juan K. Q.
    Mclennon, Everald
    Davison, Jason
    Lawry, Tom
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2020, 148
  • [10] RESPONSE TO INTERFERON IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT HCV GENOTYPES IN USA
    ZEIN, NN
    RAKELA, J
    KRAWITT, EL
    POTERUCHA, J
    GVROSS, JB
    GOSSARD, AA
    PERSING, DH
    HEPATOLOGY, 1994, 20 (04) : A156 - A156