Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review

被引:823
作者
Brett, Jo [1 ]
Staniszewska, Sophie [1 ]
Mockford, Carole [1 ]
Herron-Marx, Sandra [1 ]
Hughes, John [2 ]
Tysall, Colin [3 ]
Suleman, Rashida [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Sch Hlth & Social Studies, Nursing Res Inst, Royal Coll, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] UKCRC, London, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Univ Users Teaching & Res Act Partnership UNTRAP, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
关键词
health and social care research; impact on research; patient and public involvement; user involvement; SERVICE USER INVOLVEMENT; BREAST-CANCER RESEARCH; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; CONSUMER INVOLVEMENT; OLDER-PEOPLE; BENEFITS; DESIGN; PERSPECTIVES; COMMUNITIES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background There is an increasing international interest in patient and public involvement (PPI) in research, yet relatively little robust evidence exists about its impact on health and social care research. Objective To identify the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research. Design A systematic search of electronic databases and health libraries was undertaken from 1995 to 2009. Data were extracted and quality assessed utilizing the guidelines of the NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination 2009 and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). Grey literature was assessed using the Dixon-Woods et al. (2005) checklist. Inclusion criteria All study types that reported the impact PPI had on the health and/or social care research study. Main results A total of 66 studies reporting the impact of PPI on health and social care research were included. The positive impacts identified enhanced the quality and appropriateness of research. Impacts were reported for all stages of research, including the development of user-focused research objectives, development of user-relevant research questions, development of user-friendly information, questionnaires and interview schedules, more appropriate recruitment strategies for studies, consumer-focused interpretation of data and enhanced implementation and dissemination of study results. Some challenging impacts were also identified. Conclusion This study provides the first international evidence of PPI impact that has emerged at all key stages of the research process. However, much of the evidence base concerning impact remains weak and needs significant enhancement in the next decade.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 650
页数:14
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Bringing 'the public' into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice [J].
Abelson, Julia ;
Giacomini, Mita ;
Lehoux, Pascale ;
Gauvin, Francois-Pieffe .
HEALTH POLICY, 2007, 82 (01) :37-50
[2]   Patient participation in health research: Research with and for people with spinal cord injuries [J].
Abma, TA .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2005, 15 (10) :1310-1328
[3]   What patients want - Consumer involvement in the design of a randomized controlled trial of routine oxygen supplementation after acute stroke [J].
Ali, K ;
Roffe, C ;
Crome, P .
STROKE, 2006, 37 (03) :865-871
[4]   Benefits and drawbacks of including consumer reviewers in the scientific merit review of breast cancer research [J].
Andejeski, Y ;
Breslau, ES ;
Hart, E ;
Lythcott, N ;
Alexander, L ;
Rich, I ;
Bisceglio, I ;
Smith, HS ;
Visco, FM .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2002, 11 (02) :119-136
[5]   Quantitative impact of including consumers in the scientific review of breast cancer research proposals [J].
Andejeski, Y ;
Bisceglio, IT ;
Dickersin, K ;
Johnson, JE ;
Robinson, SI ;
Smith, HS ;
Visco, FM ;
Rich, IM .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH & GENDER-BASED MEDICINE, 2002, 11 (04) :379-388
[6]   Psychosocial intervention for rural women with breast cancer - The Sierra Stanford Partnership [J].
Angell, KL ;
Kreshka, MA ;
McCoy, R ;
Donnelly, P ;
Turner-Cobb, JM ;
Graddy, K ;
Kraemer, HC ;
Koopman, C .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 18 (07) :499-507
[7]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATION PUBLIC IN
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, RES POLICY PLANNING
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2006, OUR EXPECTATIONS REP
[10]  
[Anonymous], SYST REV CRDS GUID U