Leadership development in New Zealand and Australian medical schools: needs analysis

被引:1
作者
Lyons, Oscar [1 ]
McHardy, Karina [2 ]
Bagg, Warwick [3 ]
Wilkinson, Tim [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Surg Sci, Oxford, England
[2] Accid Compensat Corp, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Med, Div Hlth Sci, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
medical leadership; curriculum; medical student; competencies;
D O I
10.1136/leader-2019-000147
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Leadership is a core competency of doctors. However, specific learning outcomes for leadership are often not well defined in medical school curricula. This article uses New Zealand (NZ) and Australian medical school curricula as a case example for conducting a needs analysis of leadership learning outcomes. Aims To identify which elements of medical leadership development are already met by Australian Medical Council (AMC) Outcomes for Graduates, which elements are missing, and which missing elements might reasonably be included in prequalification curricula in NZ and Australia. Methods The Medical Leadership Competency Framework (MLCF) was selected as the reference framework for a general needs analysis of leadership development in the AMC curriculum. To identify curriculum gaps, we first assessed the achievability of MLCF Domains at an undergraduate level. We then considered whether the AMC Outcomes for Graduates would satisfy each MLCF Domain. Where MLCF Domains were judged unachievable at the undergraduate level, we considered whether foundations were sufficiently laid for future development. Results Five of eight (63%) undergraduate MLCF Domains and 7 of 12 (58%) postgraduate domains were found to be already satisfied by the AMC Outcomes for Graduates. Some key elements of leadership as described in the MLCF are not yet encapsulated in the AMC Outcomes for Graduates. Two particularly notable absences are audit and quality improvement. Conclusions Leadership is multidimensional. Some dimensions may be more appropriately learnt after medical school. There are, however, significant gaps in current curricula in Australia and NZ as defined by the AMC. These could be met more effectively using the MLCF.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 128
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, LEAD MAN ALL DOCT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GUIDANCE UNDERGRADUA
[3]  
Canadian College of Health Leaders & LEADS Collaborative, 2010, KEY POINTS LEAD GROW
[4]  
Council A. M., 2012, STANDARDS ASSESSMENT
[5]  
Faculty of Medical Leadership and Management, LEAD MAN STAND MED P
[6]  
Fenwick S, 2007, MANAGER, V30, P85
[7]   Leadership Development Programs for Physicians: A Systematic Review [J].
Frich, Jan C. ;
Brewster, Amanda L. ;
Cherlin, Emily J. ;
Bradley, Elizabeth H. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (05) :656-674
[8]  
General Medical Council, 2018, OUTC GRAND 2018, P25
[9]   Leadership and management in UK medical school curricula [J].
Jefferies, Richard ;
Sheriff, Ibrahim H. N. ;
Matthews, Jacob H. ;
Jagger, Olivia ;
Curtis, Sarah ;
Lees, Peter ;
Spurgeon, Peter C. ;
Fountain, Daniel Mark .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (07) :1081-1104
[10]  
Medical Council of New Zealand, 2014, NZ CURR FRAM PREV ME, P1